Posted on 03/09/2004 4:22:00 PM PST by bondserv
You'd think we could find a reasonably human-looking fossil older than 2-3 million years, or a dinosaur younger than 65 million, if Adam was around before the dinosaurs went extinct. Please do not throw the bogus Paluxy tracks up to me. I know about them, you know about them, and they're not what you wish.
How can you be so SURE?
Hello Vade.
You seem pretty certain of your assessment.
Talk about a gap! There's a gap for you. Dinosaurs way down there and only way down there. Humans up here and only up here.
The results of these two processes look different. Apparently, Schlager is either ignorant about the processes or he is lying intentionally.
I see nothing relevant to this debate in the story.
So glad you asked...
Cobaltblue claims to be Catholic, if I correctly recall.
The RCC teaches that Jesus is God.
I think you misread Bondserv.
One other thing that just doesn't quite work intellectually: If the Bible were to support evolution, I suspect evolutionists would use it as evidence for their view. But if the Bible supports special creation, somehow that is supposed to discredit creationism.
I'm not sure where you studied logic, but a non sequitur means the conclusion does not follow from the premiss(es) not, as you used it, that you can't follow the argument.
This is interesting because this week I observed a conversation between my boss, a MIT/then Stanford trained oil hunting geologist and another fellow about his experiences in geophysics. He said that the oil companies just go through the motions with the science and then management simply ignores the work and rolls the dice, usually in close proximity to a known oil field. That's why he revels in defense modeling where he gets to roll the dice and does not miss geophysics at all. I concur with you about the incestuous circular strata/fossil shuffling.
This is interesting because this week I observed a conversation between my boss, a MIT/then Stanford trained oil hunting geologist and another fellow about his experiences in geophysics. He said that the oil companies just go through the motions with the science and then management simply ignores the work and rolls the dice, usually in close proximity to a known oil field. That's why he revels in defense modeling where he gets to roll the dice and does not miss geophysics at all. I concur with you about the incestuous circular strata/fossil shuffling.
It is a big game, isn't it? The existence of oil fields is an argument for a young earth since there is no reason for porous rocks to hold the oil under pressure for more than a few thousand years let alone 65 million years.
You are limiting your perspective to ity-bity catastrophes. Try billions of tons of moving water, higher than the tallest mountains, on for size. We can only speculate as to the geologic ramifications of that kind of force applied to the earths crust, as well as the erosion footprints, and sedimentary deposits stacking up across large regions.
As this article shows, like our medical and health care scientists that say something different every day with their new studies, the "hard" sciences by their very nature exhibit the same types of confusion.
Under my plan we put the confusion in the God lock-box, under your plan you remain confused. However, I do find science entertaining and sometimes helpful.
Ahh! So there was no time's arrow before the fall (or it pointed to the future as well as the past if these terms make any sense in such a world).
The Holy Spirit (Inspired the authorship of the scripture) has you covered. Notice the descriptive language He chose to use.
Gen 4:5
5 Altogether, Adam lived 930 years, and then he died.
The Holy Spirit never misses a chance to thwart the wiles of Satan.
Calgary, Bannf, or Red Deer? I meet my wife in Calgary.
South of it runs several badlands environs..again..Dino wonderland...bones and fossils everywhere. Drumheller used to be near the edge of the inland sea wich overlay North America from the Gulf of Mexico. One can easily find the KT boundry running like a contractors snap line on the cliff wall contours. Dated at 65 million yrs ago..or so they say : ) Well..one quick visual..and noting the short descent distance down in the canyon one goes to find the KT boundry..and immediately an inquisitive mind ponders that this dating run must be faulty.
Okay, I'll bite -- how do you figure that?
What is said to be the millions of years below KT and the short interval above of terain visually doesn't jive.
Jive is for swing music...
Why exactly do you think they don't jibe? The KT boundary is less than 2% of the age of the (solid) Earth ago. Exactly how deep did you expect it to be? Yes, 65 million years ago is a long time in absolute terms, but relative to the age of the Earth, it's just a few pages out of the whole book.
Even in a canyon cutting to just the top of the precambrian rock, the KT boundary would be only 10% of the way down the canyon wall.
And that's presuming no erosion, no periods of nondeposition, and no uplift, which is certainly *not* the case for southern Alberta. Adding in those factors, the KT boundary could be found at any relative depth, including at the surface, as it is in some parts of Alberta.
Here's a stratigraphic cross-section of Alberta:
Note the Coalspur/Scollard formation -- it straddles the KT barrier. Also note that it reaches the *surface* at *several* places aross Alberta, and even disappears entirely for the eastern half of the province.
Here's an overview of the coal formations at the surface and subsurface across southern Alberta:
As you can see, the Scollard formation, which includes the KT boundary, reaches the surface around the Red Deer/Calgary area. So of course you'll find the KT boundary at a very "shallow" location (i.e. high up) on any canyon wall in that area.
So please tell me why you think that the relative position of the KT line in a particular canyon cut somehow doesn't jibe with the terrain and how you conclude that "this dating run must be faulty"?
In the Atlas mountains of North Africa is a slab of rock hundreds of feet long..at a high inclination angle. The rock has Dinosaur tracks ..they go upward the distance of the angular slab..and are easily seen..and have depth to their imprint. Supposedly..the Atlas maountains were worn down over eons..and now these tracks are at the surface after the erosion action. again..the tracks a clear..and uniform allong the slab. the slab is as flat and clean as a marble face on a downtown office building. so then.,if erosion is the action over eons..why then are the tracks so clear...should they not have been worn away by the power of what eroded the mighty Atlas mountains ?
No, because they were preserved by overlying layers for the last ~65 million years, and those layers, which included a softer layer than the print-bearing strata, have now worn away, exposing the dinosaur tracks. In another few hundred thousand years the tracks will likely be worn away as well.
That's how most fossils are preserved and then exposed at present day (not counting the vaster numbers which are still buried under strata, or long since eroded away to nothing). This is basic stuff.
Again..one see's the visual presentation and ponders that this cannot be countless millions of years.
One might ponder that if one hasn't taken beginner's courses in geology and paleontology.
Call it common sense...
That's not quite what I'd call it.
a thought rational the academic should get in touch with.
They do. That's why they study and learn about things before making conclusions about them.
[bondserv:] It is strange how the forces of the enemy cause seemingly normal people to purposely overlook the truth to protect their agenda.
Oh, right, geologists make maps of coal formations because *Satan* causes "seemingly normal people" to "purposely overlook the truth" that the KT boundary *can't* be found near the surface. Right. Got it. Whatever you say.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.