Skip to comments.
Thin women more likely to give birth to girls
Ananova ^
| March 3, 2004
Posted on 03/04/2004 4:29:59 AM PST by billorites
Thin women are more likely to give birth to girls than boys, according to research carried out by an Italian scientist.
Angelo Gagnacci, from the Polyclinic in Modena, researched around 10,000 births and found a woman's weight could influence the sex of the child.
He said his research showed that there was a higher chance that women who weighed less than eight and a half stones before falling pregnant would give birth to a girl.
For every 100 girls born to women under this weight there were only 98 boys. Women who weighed more than 54 kilos were more likely to bear a son, with 110 boys born compared to 100 girls.
Recent research conducted by American scientists found a similar phenomenon in animals, where female animals that had gone through a period of hunger or drought were also found to give birth more to female young than male.
Scientists believe that the reason could be that boy babies tended to be bigger which would make them harder for smaller women to give birth to.
Cagnacci also found that other factors such as the time of year could affect a child's gender.
"The chances of giving birth to a girl are increased if the baby is conceived in the months between March and May," said Cagnacci, adding that in return babies conceived in the autumn were more likely to be boys.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: turass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Plan accordingly.
To: billorites
Umm... I thought the "decision" was made by the individual spermatozoa.
To: billorites
BS My grandmother was thin and had two sons. My sister is thin and had two sons. I was thin when I was having my kids and I had two sons and one daughter. I look around my neighborhood and see that this notion is 100% pure BS. No offense to Billorites, you just posted it, someone else spouted it. Plus, a lot of plump women have a lot of daughters.
3
posted on
03/04/2004 4:33:36 AM PST
by
buffyt
(Can you say Vice President Hillary? ME NEITHER!)
To: BikePacker
You are RIGHT. There are some studies that suggest that there are different foods you can eat before pregnancy that could influence which gender your future baby will be. And Different douches. Baking soda if you want sons, vinegar if you want daughters. My mother used vinegar and had three daughters. I tried to foods thing and it worked for me. Coindidence maybe!
4
posted on
03/04/2004 4:35:37 AM PST
by
buffyt
(Can you say Vice President Hillary? ME NEITHER!)
To: billorites
For every 100 girls born to women under this weight there were only 98 boys.Hardly a significant result. That could have happened by mere chance.
To: billorites
Recent research conducted by American scientists found a similar phenomenon in
animals, where female animals that had gone through a period of hunger or drought
were also found to give birth more to female young than male. Apparently nature has found a way to produce more females when mortality
rises, as more females would be needed for the preservation of a species.
6
posted on
03/04/2004 4:37:18 AM PST
by
jigsaw
(God Bless Our Troops.)
To: billorites
Well, I am expecting a baby in August. Maybe I won't even bother with the sonogram. I can look at myself in the mirror and know.... it is a boy!!!
To: billorites
Anecdotal evidence: my mom was very thin during her childbearing years and she had 9 boys.
8
posted on
03/04/2004 4:42:51 AM PST
by
bvw
To: buffyt
Its a hormone in certain seafoods. BUT it only increases your changes around 5%.
To: billorites
Scientists believe that the reason is that boy babies tended to be bigger which make them harder for smaller women to give birth to.Very misleading in this context. This would make it an issue of "delivery" not "conception."
10
posted on
03/04/2004 4:43:35 AM PST
by
wai-ming
To: BikePacker
Umm... I thought the "decision" was made by the individual spermatozoa.
That's a damn good point, maybe male embryos are less likely to implant in thinner women for some reason? I must admit, it makes sense as an adaption (not the same as saying that it actually happens of course). A single male can impregnate many females so having lots of males around is a luxury which in times of starvation can be dispensed with.
11
posted on
03/04/2004 5:04:37 AM PST
by
ScudEast
To: wai-ming
This would make it an issue of "delivery" not "conception." There's lots of evidence that suggests males fetuses are less viable than female. The rate of spontaneous miscarriages is higher among male fetuses for reasons that aren't fully understood.
12
posted on
03/04/2004 5:07:47 AM PST
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: buffyt
I've always heard that if you drink diet Dr. Pepper and sing a medley of Oak Ridge Boys songs you'd conceive a boy.
13
posted on
03/04/2004 5:09:46 AM PST
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: billorites
Thin women are more likely to give birth to girls than boys, according to research carried out by an Italian scientist. ......... "The chances of giving birth to a girl are increased if the baby is conceived in the months between March and May," said Cagnacci, adding that in return babies conceived in the autumn were more likely to be boys.
RUH ROH................does this mean a child conceived in the fall to a skinny woman is transgendered??????
14
posted on
03/04/2004 5:10:40 AM PST
by
Gabz
(The tobacco industry doesn't pay cigarette taxes - smokers do!)
To: billorites
before falling pregnant i have heard of 'turning up pregnant', but never have i heard of FALLING pregnant...
15
posted on
03/04/2004 5:11:07 AM PST
by
xsmommy
To: xsmommy
"but never have i heard of FALLING pregnant..."Depends what you fall on.
Mind your step.
16
posted on
03/04/2004 5:12:50 AM PST
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: billorites
Depends what you fall on.
Mind your step.
That made my day, thanks :)
17
posted on
03/04/2004 5:14:05 AM PST
by
ScudEast
To: billorites
surgical measures have been taken to insure that there are no consequences to any possible misstep or stumbling.... ; )
18
posted on
03/04/2004 5:14:48 AM PST
by
xsmommy
To: billorites
And thin women are more likely to weigh less (than fat women). Gads, and the day is just starting.
To: buffyt
I agree with the BS. I was thin when I conceived each of my sons. I was at my heaviest when I conceived my only daughter.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson