Skip to comments.
WORST PRESIDENT IN HISTORY
Kalona News ^
| Feb 15, 2004
| Ethel Bontrager
Posted on 03/03/2004 1:45:51 PM PST by 11th_VA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-170 next last
To: 11th_VA
boolmark
61
posted on
03/03/2004 4:20:51 PM PST
by
ezo4
To: 11th_VA
Next to Lincoln, Bush is the second greatest President in history. Too bad the Dems can't give him his due.
To: 11th_VA
Liberals lie an awful lot come to think of it they lie all the time.
63
posted on
03/03/2004 4:22:37 PM PST
by
solo gringo
(Always Ranting Always Rite)
To: Qwinn
¡Quiero venir a la fiesta en tu casa, el día de la liberación!
¡CUBA LIBRE!
64
posted on
03/03/2004 4:42:57 PM PST
by
Choose Ye This Day
(Con Presidente Bush, vamos por buen camino.)
To: 11th_VA
I would argue that Bush also liberated Liberia and Haiti from brutal despots.
To: MurryMom
>>"The canard about Sudan's offering of OBL to the Clinton administration is just another lie initiated and spread by apologists for Bush's failures."
http://www.newsmax.com/clinton2.mp3
66
posted on
03/03/2004 4:52:47 PM PST
by
modhom
To: 11th_VA
Well saidBadly said This is one of the most poorly thought out articles I've ever read. Her choices of examples are puzzling to say the least.
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us:
Is she nuts? Germany declared WAR on the US after Pearl Harbor. Does she really blame Roosevelt for fighting back against an evil dictatorship that declared war on America.
As for Truman and Kennedy, I guess that it's too much to hope that she would blame the communists who actually started the wars. And she calls it liberation when Pres Bush acted preemptively against terrorism, but 2 democrats do the same thing against communism forces and it's wrong.
The remarks about Clinton and Bosnia simply misses the mark. We never declared war on Bosnia, I believe all Bosnia every saw of us were a few peacekeepers. Kosavo(sp?) is where we had Clinton's famous air war.
The only one she got half right was Pres. Johnson, whose micromanagement of the military, destroyed the war effort.
If she was to give examples of Bad Presidents then she should start with President Wilson, who won by smearing his opponent with accusations that he would get the US fighting in WW1. Something Wilson promptly did upon entering office.
There is not enough space to list all the harmful effects of the Clinton presidency. But Bosnia?, that's such small potatos. It's like critizing hitler for his mustache.
To: antceecee
Does anyone have the figures on lives lost during Clinton's Bosnia episodes? I imagine it would be extremely small if any, after somelia. Clinton went out of his way to avoid putting us troops in danger. That's why his air war in kosavo(sp?) was such a joke. He had the planes flying too high (to avoid AAA)to be effective in their mission.
To: 11th_VA
Very good llth_VA...........just hope the American people see this and realize we have a great President in GW.....a real leader. I don't always agree with him, but on the war front, I'm behind him and our troops a thousand percent!
69
posted on
03/03/2004 5:12:07 PM PST
by
Dawgreg
(Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
To: Carry_Okie
Remember 21% interest rates?
Wasn't 21 % the PRIME rate? Interest the consumer would have paid was above that?
To: ridesthemiles
Wasn't 21 % the PRIME rate? Yup.
71
posted on
03/03/2004 6:13:24 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly stupid.)
To: SAMWolf; snippy_about_it; Victoria Delsoul; Jen; MeekOneGOP; mrs tiggywinkle; RadioAstronomer
Ping
To: SpookBrat
Worst President in History
Any Democrat.
73
posted on
03/03/2004 6:50:33 PM PST
by
SAMWolf
(I'd love to help you out. Which way did you come in?)
To: SpookBrat
My top choices, FDR and of course clinton.
74
posted on
03/03/2004 6:51:58 PM PST
by
snippy_about_it
(Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
To: Carry_Okie
Reagan faced a Democrat dominated Congress, a Russian military on the advance, and Central America gone communist. W has barely addressed, much less reversed that Latin American threat. The vision and leadership that generated SDI, or the sheer chutzpah to call for the fall of the Berlin Wall are unequalled in the Twentieth Century. His leadership vs the UN was far more independent than Bush, who has, in some respects, strengthened that corrupt institution. Reagan rolled back many federal regulations, where in some cases they are worse under W than they were under Bubba. Although I will give you the point about O'Connor, W has refused to pursue his judicial appointments against what should have been an ephemeral opposition, rendering those appointments a possible empty gesture to conservatives, rather than a substantive commitment to judicial change. 1. I'm not comforable calling our illegal alien problem "the Latin American threat," I call it an illegal alien problem.
2. Reagan invaded Grenada, much to his credit (and allowed defenseless members of our armed forces to be murdered in Lebanon, in a bad case of UN cooperation). Bush 43, well you know about what he's been doing militarily, and it's been more of an investment than going to the Berlin wall with a microphone.
3. Bush and Senate Republicans have had their hands significantly and constitutionally tied, in overcomming unprecedented and atrocious Democrat obstruction. (Wish I could remember the FR article about this, but it didn't read like an ephemeral opposition, to me.)
I think Reagan was a critically important and great president, who along with his Republican predecessors and one successor, committed grave error in Supreme Court nomination --though fewer of these mistakes I think than Eisenhower or Bush 41 --a tie with Nixon, if I recall.
75
posted on
03/03/2004 6:59:20 PM PST
by
unspun
(The uncontextualized life is not worth living. | I'm not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate.)
To: roadcat
Ha-ha! I've thrown that back into liberal faces. That Clinton is the worst president in two centuries - the 20th and the 21st!Make that two different millennia.
76
posted on
03/03/2004 7:00:39 PM PST
by
Consort
To: 11th_VA
Hear, hear!
77
posted on
03/03/2004 7:09:27 PM PST
by
SW6906
To: 11th_VA
Ethel Bontrager must be a FReeper. Sure sounds like it! Superb thoughts.
78
posted on
03/03/2004 7:21:51 PM PST
by
harpo11
(Give 'em Hell Team Bush! The Right Didn't Start the Fire! We're Fightin' to Put It Out!)
To: SpookBrat
BTTT!
79
posted on
03/03/2004 7:31:18 PM PST
by
Victoria Delsoul
(Despite intense and violent criticism against the Passion, the public has spoken at the box office)
To: 11th_VA
We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11! Why, yes it was. As a matter of fact, it was started when Cain slew Abel. Saying we are in a War on Terror is like saying we are in a War on Evil. There is no clear enemy, no clear objective, and definitely no end to the war. The principle effect is to pump up the government with war powers and provide a pretext to label anyone who objects as unpatriotic, subversive, pro-terrorist, or enemy combatant.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-170 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson