[Unam Sanctam]

I wrote to my congressman in favor of a Constitutional amendment to prevent the government from promoting homosexual activity through civil gay marriage, stressing that it was not about freedom, since gay marriage will not allow homosexuals to do anything they can currently do. He wrote back with the canard that he does not support "discrimination". Discrimination is not the issue, but rather the government promoting activity that poses a complex moral problem that people have a right to have different views on. The government should be neutral on homosexual activity, not promote it.

[WOSG]

I wrote to my congressman in favor of a Constitutional amendment to prevent the government from promoting homosexual activity through civil gay marriage, stressing that it was not about freedom, since gay marriage will not allow homosexuals to do anything they can currently do. He wrote back with the canard that he does not support "discrimination". Discrimination is not the issue, but rather the government promoting activity that poses a complex moral problem that people have a right to have different views on. The government should be neutral on homosexual activity, not promote it. Is your congresscritter a Democrat or a Republican?

[MeekOneGOP]

It would be interesting to see what your Congressman's
response would be if you sent him THIS article ...

[rockrr]

Reduced to its essence, your congress-critter is actively discriminating - against YOU!
By assenting to, and endorsing SOME interests, against the expressed interests of others (including you!), he discriminates against you.
What a putz......

[BrucefromMtVernon]

There's no point in writing to Congresscritter Jim Moran about the Marriage Amendment. He's clearly and overtly on the dark side of the force. As for the term "gay marriage"....it isn't "gay" and it isn't "marriage".