Skip to comments.
Gun Liability Bill Falls in the Senate
C-Span
Posted on 03/02/2004 1:18:03 PM PST by brothers4thID
The Gun Manufacturers Liability Bill just failed by a vote of 8-90. Now there are no worries about the AWB (for now!).
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1805; awb; bang; banglist; gunscongresssenate; lawsuits; tortreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 241-252 next last
To: Texas Federalist
To: SoDak
With regards to your question on were the Republican leadership is. That is simple they are still of the opinion that Democrats are a loyal opposition who love the Constitution. They also suffer from the idea that if they are nice to the talking heads & the democrats in the congress that they will be liked by these vermin .
102
posted on
03/02/2004 2:31:31 PM PST
by
Nebr FAL owner
(.308 REACH OUT & THUMP SOMEONE .50BMG REACH OUT & CRUSH SOMEONE!)
To: jf55510
There is a total lack of leadership in the Senate Not entirely - the RATs controlled this little fiasco and played the Repubos like a fiddle - just like they have been doing since 2000. The Senate is George Bush' nemesis, and it will continue to be so unless the '04 elections sway the balance of power to the Repubos - which may not be too likely. One thing is certain -Frist needs to step down as majority leader.
103
posted on
03/02/2004 2:31:47 PM PST
by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: Dead Corpse
The date on that entry is Nov. 2003. That was probably when they placed it on the scedule to be brought up this week.
To: deport
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 108th Congress - 2nd Session
as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate
Vote Summary
Question: On Passage of the Bill (S. 1805 as amended ) |
Vote Number: |
30 |
Vote Date: |
March 2, 2004, 03:51 PM |
Required For Majority: |
1/2 |
Vote Result: |
Bill Defeated |
Measure Number: |
S. 1805 (Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act ) |
Measure Title: |
A bill to prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages resulting from the misuse of their products by others. |
Vote Counts: |
YEAs |
8 |
|
NAYs |
90 |
|
Not Voting |
2 |
Alphabetical by Senator Name
Akaka (D-HI), Nay Alexander (R-TN), Nay Allard (R-CO), Nay Allen (R-VA), Nay Baucus (D-MT), Nay Bayh (D-IN), Nay Bennett (R-UT), Nay Biden (D-DE), Nay Bingaman (D-NM), Nay Bond (R-MO), Nay Boxer (D-CA), Nay Breaux (D-LA), Yea Brownback (R-KS), Nay Bunning (R-KY), Nay Burns (R-MT), Nay Byrd (D-WV), Nay Campbell (R-CO), Nay Cantwell (D-WA), Nay Carper (D-DE), Nay Chafee (R-RI), Nay Chambliss (R-GA), Nay Clinton (D-NY), Nay Cochran (R-MS), Nay Coleman (R-MN), Nay Collins (R-ME), Nay Conrad (D-ND), Nay Cornyn (R-TX), Nay Corzine (D-NJ), Nay Craig (R-ID), Nay Crapo (R-ID), Nay Daschle (D-SD), Yea Dayton (D-MN), Nay DeWine (R-OH), Nay Dodd (D-CT), Nay
|
Dole (R-NC), Nay Domenici (R-NM), Nay Dorgan (D-ND), Nay Durbin (D-IL), Nay Edwards (D-NC), Not Voting Ensign (R-NV), Nay Enzi (R-WY), Nay Feingold (D-WI), Nay Feinstein (D-CA), Nay Fitzgerald (R-IL), Nay Frist (R-TN), Nay Graham (D-FL), Nay Graham (R-SC), Nay Grassley (R-IA), Nay Gregg (R-NH), Nay Hagel (R-NE), Nay Harkin (D-IA), Nay Hatch (R-UT), Nay Hollings (D-SC), Nay Hutchison (R-TX), Nay Inhofe (R-OK), Nay Inouye (D-HI), Nay Jeffords (I-VT), Nay Johnson (D-SD), Not Voting Kennedy (D-MA), Nay Kerry (D-MA), Nay Kohl (D-WI), Nay Kyl (R-AZ), Nay Landrieu (D-LA), Nay Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay Leahy (D-VT), Nay Levin (D-MI), Nay Lieberman (D-CT), Yea Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
|
Lott (R-MS), Nay Lugar (R-IN), Yea McCain (R-AZ), Yea McConnell (R-KY), Nay Mikulski (D-MD), Nay Miller (D-GA), Nay Murkowski (R-AK), Nay Murray (D-WA), Nay Nelson (D-FL), Nay Nelson (D-NE), Nay Nickles (R-OK), Nay Pryor (D-AR), Yea Reed (D-RI), Nay Reid (D-NV), Nay Roberts (R-KS), Nay Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay Santorum (R-PA), Nay Sarbanes (D-MD), Nay Schumer (D-NY), Nay Sessions (R-AL), Nay Shelby (R-AL), Nay Smith (R-OR), Nay Snowe (R-ME), Nay Specter (R-PA), Nay Stabenow (D-MI), Nay Stevens (R-AK), Nay Sununu (R-NH), Nay Talent (R-MO), Nay Thomas (R-WY), Nay Voinovich (R-OH), Yea Warner (R-VA), Nay Wyden (D-OR), Nay
|
Grouped By Vote Position
YEAs ---8 |
Breaux (D-LA) Daschle (D-SD) Lieberman (D-CT)
|
Lincoln (D-AR) Lugar (R-IN) McCain (R-AZ)
|
Pryor (D-AR) Voinovich (R-OH)
|
NAYs ---90 |
Akaka (D-HI) Alexander (R-TN) Allard (R-CO) Allen (R-VA) Baucus (D-MT) Bayh (D-IN) Bennett (R-UT) Biden (D-DE) Bingaman (D-NM) Bond (R-MO) Boxer (D-CA) Brownback (R-KS) Bunning (R-KY) Burns (R-MT) Byrd (D-WV) Campbell (R-CO) Cantwell (D-WA) Carper (D-DE) Chafee (R-RI) Chambliss (R-GA) Clinton (D-NY) Cochran (R-MS) Coleman (R-MN) Collins (R-ME) Conrad (D-ND) Cornyn (R-TX) Corzine (D-NJ) Craig (R-ID) Crapo (R-ID) Dayton (D-MN)
|
DeWine (R-OH) Dodd (D-CT) Dole (R-NC) Domenici (R-NM) Dorgan (D-ND) Durbin (D-IL) Ensign (R-NV) Enzi (R-WY) Feingold (D-WI) Feinstein (D-CA) Fitzgerald (R-IL) Frist (R-TN) Graham (D-FL) Graham (R-SC) Grassley (R-IA) Gregg (R-NH) Hagel (R-NE) Harkin (D-IA) Hatch (R-UT) Hollings (D-SC) Hutchison (R-TX) Inhofe (R-OK) Inouye (D-HI) Jeffords (I-VT) Kennedy (D-MA) Kerry (D-MA) Kohl (D-WI) Kyl (R-AZ) Landrieu (D-LA) Lautenberg (D-NJ)
|
Leahy (D-VT) Levin (D-MI) Lott (R-MS) McConnell (R-KY) Mikulski (D-MD) Miller (D-GA) Murkowski (R-AK) Murray (D-WA) Nelson (D-FL) Nelson (D-NE) Nickles (R-OK) Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Roberts (R-KS) Rockefeller (D-WV) Santorum (R-PA) Sarbanes (D-MD) Schumer (D-NY) Sessions (R-AL) Shelby (R-AL) Smith (R-OR) Snowe (R-ME) Specter (R-PA) Stabenow (D-MI) Stevens (R-AK) Sununu (R-NH) Talent (R-MO) Thomas (R-WY) Warner (R-VA) Wyden (D-OR)
|
Not Voting - 2 |
Edwards (D-NC)
|
Johnson (D-SD)
|
|
105
posted on
03/02/2004 2:33:05 PM PST
by
deport
(For Sale: Iraqi rifle, never fired, dropped once)
To: Recovering_Democrat
That guy just looks like a snake in the grass!
106
posted on
03/02/2004 2:33:43 PM PST
by
BobinIL
To: Joe Brower
You have to give the statist left credit for one thing: they are incredibly tenacious.Evil never sleeps.
107
posted on
03/02/2004 2:34:17 PM PST
by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: deport
Thanks for the info: Luger, McCain and Voinovich . . . I could have guessed.
To: claudiustg
No just get ready to listen to complaints about how Bush has turned his back on gun owners, on the Constitution, on blah, blah, blah. His enemies are never satisfied.
109
posted on
03/02/2004 2:35:52 PM PST
by
justshutupandtakeit
(America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
To: deport
McCain and Daschle on the same side yet again, how poetic.
110
posted on
03/02/2004 2:36:11 PM PST
by
SoDak
To: Monty22
Yes, Monty. They really, really want the AWB extension, and more. They want an all out ban on semi's.
To: NittanyLion
You must be laboring under the delusion that these lawsuits have been effective against manufacturers. They haven't. RATS just delayed making it almost impossible but have not "won" anything. Two more RAT Senator losses and the amendments will not pass. Fitzdumbass will not return from Il. so his replacement could be more reliable on this issue.
112
posted on
03/02/2004 2:39:23 PM PST
by
justshutupandtakeit
(America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
To: Lurker
here's a link to a reliable nooz source...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,113046,00.html
To: Lurker
The AWB does not "sunset" until September 04..
The amendment to S.1805 does place the continuance of the AWB in jeapordy, but a seperate bill to extend AWB could still be introduced..
Additionally, a new AWB (with expanded powers) could still be introduced between now and Sept. 04..
Just something to consider..
114
posted on
03/02/2004 2:43:05 PM PST
by
Drammach
("Have a Good Day, in a Free America")
To: deport; Flyer; dix; Eaker; humblegunner; bobbyd; Allegra; Xenalyte; pax_et_bonum; TheMom; ...
You know, I am just floored by this...
Why would you go to the trouble of attaching an amendment to a bill, get it approved...The entire bill goes to a vote, then vote against the whole thing???
Maybe I am not seeing it, but this is not making a bit of sense...
But I see that the 8 Senators who did vote for this as a whole, are probably going to be long gone come November, we can only hope...
Something smells really bad here...I am wondering are we going to be in for a surprise here somewhere down the road before September 13th, at midnight???
Later,
Steve
115
posted on
03/02/2004 2:43:59 PM PST
by
stevie_d_64
(Houston Area Texans)
To: brothers4thID
I don't agree .. I think it was a set-up by the repubs.
The repubs wanted a clean bill. First they had to kill the bill with the amendments. They did! Now they can start over with a clean bill - after the November elections, when they can get it through the senate - clean!!
The rats think they defeated us - when in reality I believe the repubs have just pulled off a coup against the dems.
And .. the repubs have put the dems ON THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD FOR BEING AGAINST UNFAIR GUN LAWSUITS, and voting against the bill they had loaded with amendments. This is just too cool.
116
posted on
03/02/2004 2:44:36 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: Texas Federalist
Yep. Hasn't come up yet for consideration on the floor.
117
posted on
03/02/2004 2:45:50 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Dead Corpse
You are right the House bill passed without all that crap.
118
posted on
03/02/2004 2:47:17 PM PST
by
pro2A Mom
(http://www.2asisters.org)
To: justshutupandtakeit
Illinois is dominated by Chiagao and its suburbs.
Fitzgerald will probably be replaced by a RAT. No net loss on 2A, but a loss on judges.
GOP needs to sweep the seats in the South (FL, NC, SC, GA, and LA) to ensure this bill can pass without poison pills. I also think Daschle is going to have some trouble. Yeah, he co-sponsored, but he tried to have it both ways.
The other lesson is NOT to let thrid-party types draw you away. Slade Gorton was reliably pro-gun, but Maria Cantwell beat him because too many folks decided Gorton wasn't "principled" enough and went third-party in 2000. I'd rather have Ensign defending a seat this year as opposed to doing so in 2006 due to third-party votes as well. And there is the issue of John Thune vs. Tim Johnson in 2002.
Think it over, folks.
119
posted on
03/02/2004 2:47:42 PM PST
by
hchutch
(Why did the Nazgul bother running from Arwen's flash flood? They only managed to die tired.)
To: stevie_d_64
---Maybe I am not seeing it, but this is not making a bit of sense... ---
I'm with you! All I can figure is that each honorable lunkerhead can now go tell their constituents that they voted such and such. Many of them will be able to tell one group that they were for and another group that they were against.
120
posted on
03/02/2004 2:49:16 PM PST
by
claudiustg
(Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 241-252 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson