Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BJClinton
I am not a lawyer, I am not offering legal advice, and (so far as you know ;>) I might even be 'lying through my teeth.' Please keep that in mind as you consider the following:

Okay, so let me get this straight: The Ruger mini-14 is NOT covered by the AWB?

Some factory Mini-14s were covered by the AWB. The Mini-14/20GB had a bayonnet lug, threaded muzzle and flash supressor; and Ruger made Mini-14s with pistol-grip folding stocks as well.

Does anyone know if the after-market plastic and fiber-glass stocks and clips are covered? If so, it would seem this would simply hurt Colt, Bushmaster et al that manufacture AR-15 variants as people move to the mini-14 and buy the pistol-grip stocks and extended clips separately.

I believe adding too many of the 'evil features' listed in the AWB to a post ban Mini-14 (or even a pre-ban rifle that was not previously configured as an 'assault weapon') could constitute construction of an illegal 'assault weapon.'

And then, of course, there are State laws...

;>)

685 posted on 03/02/2004 3:59:22 PM PST by Who is John Galt? ("Never bring a taco to a gunfight..." Sans-Culotte, 02/26/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 600 | View Replies ]


To: Who is John Galt?
Thanks for the info. My Mini-14 is the standard Wal-Mart special. No threaded barrel or lug. The replacement stock has a pistol grip but does not fold. So I guess I have 2 of 3 evil options. As far as state laws: thank God I live in Texas.
758 posted on 03/03/2004 10:41:36 AM PST by BJClinton (Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, I'm a registered Dem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson