Skip to comments.
Gay rep gets squeezed (lesbians vs. blacks in MA redistricting)
BostonHerald.com ^
| 2/27/04
| Marantz
Posted on 02/29/2004 6:54:05 AM PST by pabianice
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
02/29/2004 6:54:06 AM PST
by
pabianice
To: little jeremiah; mhking
Interesting, gays vs. blacks, and blacks are NOT supportive of gay marriage.
Thank goodness. Now if blacks will just LEAVE the Democratic Party in droves over the issue we'll be winning a lot more.
Come on over the waters fine!
2
posted on
02/29/2004 7:00:08 AM PST
by
I_Love_My_Husband
(Borders, Language, Culture, Straights - now more than ever)
To: I_Love_My_Husband
My gut tells me that Latino's won't be too supporting of it either.
To: pabianice
"Gay rep gets squeezed"My goodness!
4
posted on
02/29/2004 7:04:29 AM PST
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: pabianice
``As gays and lesbians, we don't have any status in terms of being considered as a group or a class in that equation,'' she said. The next frontier after gay marriage becomes a reality.
Redistricting now will need to be based on sexual orientation in addition to race and national origin.
Hundreds of court challenges because Congress does not contain 20% gay Congressmen (since the activists claim that 20% of the population is gay).
5
posted on
02/29/2004 7:22:07 AM PST
by
07055
To: pabianice
non-white voters tend to be less supportive of gay marriage.Bush landslide in 2004.
``As gays and lesbians, we don't have any status in terms of being considered as a group or a class in that equation,''
That's because you're a handful of dysfunctional sex addicts who need to pervert other peoples children for political power. Any questions?
``For anyone to suggest we shouldn't do something because it might adversely affect a representative on any particular issue is a folly.''
Don't worry about it. If the homosexuals don't like it, they'll just make their own laws anyway. They're nut cases.
6
posted on
02/29/2004 7:26:48 AM PST
by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: 07055
(since the activists claim that 20% of the population is gay).The "0" at the end of the number must have been a typo. It's 2%.
The homosexual "marriages" in SF were just as much UK and Canadian homos as Americans (FOX). It was for pro-sodomy propaganda.
7
posted on
02/29/2004 7:32:20 AM PST
by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: I_Love_My_Husband
Now if blacks will just LEAVE the Democratic Party in droves over the issue Backs are Democrats for the same reason Jews are Democrats... Both engage in professional victimology. As long as both groups crave to be seen as victims they will remain Democrats.... no other issue counts.
Do Romans complain about the Romans being blamed for crucifing Christ in the Film the Passion of Christ? Do people of Slavic descent demand reparations for being the original slaves?
Jews and Blacks are victims. They will be victims and Democrats until the end of time.
To: Common Tator
True, professional victims, but I've been seeing more and more Jews leaving the Democrats, even if it's just 1% that's a good sign.
And here in FReepland, there are loads of Jews, amazingly. I think it's all good :)
9
posted on
02/29/2004 7:48:57 AM PST
by
I_Love_My_Husband
(Borders, Language, Culture, Straights - now more than ever)
To: pabianice
State Representative Liz Malia
To: pabianice
The Black Eye for the Gay Vote.
11
posted on
02/29/2004 8:16:52 AM PST
by
coloradan
(Hence, etc.)
To: 07055
Hundreds of court challenges because Congress does not contain 20% gay Congressmen (since the activists claim that 20% of the population is gay). That would be difficult to prove. There's no box you're required to check on the census describing sexual orientation.
12
posted on
02/29/2004 8:24:41 AM PST
by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: Semper Paratus
In JP the Latinos have help filling out their ballots, 11th precinct, can't have the illegals voting wrong can we?
13
posted on
02/29/2004 9:29:01 AM PST
by
Little Bill
(I can't take another rat in the White House at my age.)
To: I_Love_My_Husband
here in FReepland, there are loads of JewsMe! Me!
To: Screaming_Gerbil
She's definitely a dyke. She won't be elected by black folk. Thankfully.
15
posted on
02/29/2004 9:39:00 AM PST
by
I_Love_My_Husband
(Borders, Language, Culture, Straights - now more than ever)
To: Semper Paratus
I am willing to vote for a black, but I am not willing to vote for anyone who supports gay marriage, no matter what color.
16
posted on
02/29/2004 9:42:33 AM PST
by
tessalu
To: Paleo Conservative
That would be difficult to prove. There's no box you're required to check on the census describing sexual orientation. There's no box---yet.
President Kerry would make this a top priority.
17
posted on
02/29/2004 9:48:14 AM PST
by
07055
To: 07055
Can you imagine all of the boxes they will add?:
Lesbian
Gay
Bisexual
Transgendered
Curious
Hetrosexual but ashamed to admit it.
18
posted on
02/29/2004 9:56:45 AM PST
by
07055
To: pabianice
Rep. Liz Malia (D-Jamaica Plain), one of the symbolic leaders of the gay marriage movement, represents a district - the 11th Suffolk - targeted by Tuesday's federal court ruling as being unfair to black voters. The ruling compels the House to redraw the boundaries of the 11th Suffolk to increase the non-white voting population - most likely by adding precincts from Roxbury and Dorchester and taking away white Jamaica Plain precincts. But in the process it could weaken Malia's grip on the seat she has held since 1998, particularly because non-white voters tend to be less supportive of gay marriage. In claiming that the homosexual agenda is the moral equivalent of desegregation, the tin-eared Left has essentially claimed that to be black is the moral equivalent of being homosexual... "not that there's anything wrong with that." That analogy has a lot wrong with it, and doesn't sit well with Blacks. Now American Blacks, in whose communities marriage and family has long been under siege, are watching the degenerate Left attempt to destroy marriage altogether under cover of "civil rights." I do not believe the choir to which pro-homosexual Left is preaching sings in Black churches on Sundays. Even Bill Clinton, having spent all that time in AME churches, knew enough to sign the Defense of Marraige Act in 1996.
|
19
posted on
02/29/2004 10:01:49 AM PST
by
Sabertooth
(Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
To: pabianice
Looks like this lesbian hack will soon be looking for a job in the dreaded private sector.
20
posted on
02/29/2004 10:15:09 AM PST
by
dennisw
(“The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction.”)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson