Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HarryCaul
NO NO NO!!! Osama's caught, therefore no more war on terror, therefore no more need for Bush.
25 posted on 02/28/2004 2:26:06 AM PST by rottndog (woof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: rottndog
NO NO NO!!! Osama's caught, therefore no more war on terror, therefore no more need for Bush.

I'm sure the Leftists will cry fowl either way. If Osama's on the loose, the Bush shouldn't be President 'cause he can't catch him. And if Osama's in U.S. custody, then Bush shouldn't be President 'cause Osama's no longer at large.

And I'm sure John Kerry and the rest of the Dumbocrats will insist that they'd have found Osama sooner than Bush...

35 posted on 02/28/2004 2:29:01 AM PST by Prime Choice (I'm pro-choice. I just think the "choice" should be made *before* having sex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson