To: rottndog
NO NO NO!!! Osama's caught, therefore no more war on terror, therefore no more need for Bush. I'm sure the Leftists will cry fowl either way. If Osama's on the loose, the Bush shouldn't be President 'cause he can't catch him. And if Osama's in U.S. custody, then Bush shouldn't be President 'cause Osama's no longer at large.
And I'm sure John Kerry and the rest of the Dumbocrats will insist that they'd have found Osama sooner than Bush...
35 posted on
02/28/2004 2:29:01 AM PST by
Prime Choice
(I'm pro-choice. I just think the "choice" should be made *before* having sex.)
To: Prime Choice
Well, yeah, the Dems will find something wrong with it, but the swing vote would be settled. Locked in solid.
To: Prime Choice
And I'm sure John Kerry and the rest of the Dumbocrats will insist that they'd have found Osama sooner than Bush Well sure he will. Osama has just been waiting to turn himself in to "law enforcement".
39 posted on
02/28/2004 2:30:53 AM PST by
Texasforever
(When demcrats attack it is called campaigning)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson