To: Weirdad
Why should not The Son of David (Luke 18:38) have been a relatively small man like His great ancestor? It never seems to have occurred to most image-makers that Jesus could be relatively short, or stout, or even have had a receding hairline. If the Shroud of Turin is any indication, Jesus Christ was, in fact, a man who was extraordinarily tall for that period of time. The image on the shroud doesn't seem to have a receding hairline, either.
28 posted on
02/27/2004 8:35:55 PM PST by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
To: Alberta's Child
Why should not The Son of David (Luke 18:38) have been a relatively small man like His great ancestor? It never seems to have occurred to most image-makers that Jesus could be relatively short, or stout, or even have had a receding hairline.
If the Shroud of Turin is any indication, Jesus Christ was, in fact, a man who was extraordinarily tall for that period of time. The image on the shroud doesn't seem to have a receding hairline, either.
Perhaps there is an opening for fox television to do it's own 'Passion' movie, "The Littlelest Jesus".
I probably shouldn't have said that - someone at fox will probably think it's a good idea.
196 posted on
02/27/2004 11:51:46 PM PST by
flashbunny
(Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson