Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Physicist
But I don't see anyone pressing for legislation that require disclaimers to be slapped on the atomic theory of matter, or the theory of the heliocentric solar system.

Are you really trying to compare evolutionary theory -- which its proponents admit is still up in the air in many respects -- to the heliocentric solar system?

Get a grip!

76 posted on 02/27/2004 2:03:50 PM PST by JohnnyZ (People don't just bump into each other and have sex. This isn't Cinemax! -- Jerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: JohnnyZ
Are you really trying to compare evolutionary theory -- which its proponents admit is still up in the air in many respects -- to the heliocentric solar system?

And heliocentricism isn't controversial?
78 posted on 02/27/2004 2:05:55 PM PST by Dimensio (I gave you LIFE! I -- AAAAAAAAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: JohnnyZ
Are you really trying to compare evolutionary theory -- which its proponents admit is still up in the air in many respects -- to the heliocentric solar system?

Absolutely. The fact that animals change over time is no more disputable than the fact that the sun sits (approximately) at the center of the solar system. The gaps in the detailed models of both are comparable in seriousness. As one example of a gap in the heliocentric model, I give you the long-term stability of planetary orbits. How does that occur? There are several good ideas, but that's a far from settled point.

86 posted on 02/27/2004 2:19:10 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson