Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blood of Tyrants
If they ban armor piercing ammo now and then redefine what constitutes "armor piercing" ammo later, with the study, won't it be a matter of a bureaucrat inking in additional types of ammo as "armor piercing" to the list ala Congressional study definitions? Who decides how heavy the body-armor used in the study will be?
35 posted on 02/27/2004 8:47:25 AM PST by TigersEye (Carrying a gun is a social obligation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
AP ammo is defined and ammo that falls under that definition is banned now. This amendment does NOT change that definition nor does it authorize anyone to do so. There is no requirement in the law to do anyting at all with the results of the study.
40 posted on 02/27/2004 8:52:08 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson