[eno_]

The real test of an anarchist is to have him list any laws that he may favor. ZIP. Of course his constant ranting, name calling and distortions also tend to give him away.

I would be perfectly happy with the set of laws we had pre-New Deal and pre-Prohibition, along with the same levels of taxation and regulation, and the same ratio of government spending to GDP. Do you know what they called people who were against the New Deal? Republican.

Since I gave you a straight answer. How about you give me one: How many cabinet-level departments and all the laws related to then do you think are anti-constitutional? How many FLEOs is enough? And how about those unenumerated rights?

[_Jim]

How many FLEOs is enough?

Is your *real* answer to crime (and the criminal element) the same as John F'ing Kerrys is to terrorism in the world: "We'll negotiate with them and let the UN handle it"?

IF so, fergit it.

Ever watch John Walsh's America's Most Wanted? There are some REAL bad guys out there - in case you haven't noticed ...

AND who would handle domestic terrorism surveillance?

The postal service?

[cinFLA]

I would be perfectly happy with the set of laws we had pre-New Deal and pre-Prohibition,

You mean back when the BOR's did not apply to the states. Then this thug, Mr. H. would not have the 9th to bail him out of his mess.