Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sandy
"You then made the incorrect inference that his statement was a denial of Barron. "

Barron said the BOR- in the dicta all of the BOR- did not and was not meant to apply to the states.

Other than perhaps that the states never gave up their power to "violate" the right to keep and bear arms...
I don't see your contention.

458 posted on 02/24/2004 1:06:45 PM PST by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
I don't see your contention.

Just pointing out that tpaine's statement doesn't mean he's not familiar with the Barron decision. That's all.

462 posted on 02/24/2004 1:14:45 PM PST by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies ]

To: mrsmith; tpaine
Changing the subject...

There's an interesting debate about the Ninth Amendment that's been spreading around some law blogs. You guys might like it. It's great reading, imo.

Start here if you're inclined to check it out.

465 posted on 02/24/2004 1:20:23 PM PST by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson