To: mrsmith; tpaine
Changing the subject...
There's an interesting debate about the Ninth Amendment that's been spreading around some law blogs. You guys might like it. It's great reading, imo.
Start here if you're inclined to check it out.
465 posted on
02/24/2004 1:20:23 PM PST by
Sandy
To: Sandy; _Jim; cinFLA
The real test of a jackboot licker is this:
List some unenumerated rights.
A true blue jackboot licking Drug Warrior will return a blank page. For extra credit, ask them to provide the constitutional basis for the ATF, and ask how it differs from the "constitutional basis" of the EPA, OSHA, and the whole list of other post New Deal anti-constitutional abominations.
Scratch police enthusiast deep enough and you will find one of FDR's komrades.
467 posted on
02/24/2004 1:29:27 PM PST by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
To: Sandy
Changing the subject... Why not answer some of the questions ON the subject.
470 posted on
02/24/2004 1:34:12 PM PST by
cinFLA
To: Sandy
Sandy, thanks for the link..
Lots of interesting stuff there, but I finally gave up on it cause it so sloooww for my machine.. At one point I thought I had a postable article on the Ninth. Then I lost that link and couldn't get back to it.. Frustrating..
I may have to bite the bullet & visit Fry's for some new equipment.
505 posted on
02/24/2004 5:02:22 PM PST by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson