[_Jim]

All of these curious circumstances and omissions are facts, not "speculation." Or do you also believe dogs eat a lot of homework?

Synthesizing a 'case' out of thin air again transposed against the known facts of the event?

Great ... you do great service to Free Republic, logic and reason this way.

"You are known by the friends you keep, the seeds you sow and the harvest you reap."

[eno_]

You could try answering the questions: Do you find it credible that the witness could not be located?

Not by notes taken by the dispatcher that took the call (if there ever was a call)?

Not by the logs of the PD's phone system (if such logs show the call ever happened)?

Not by means of calling the witness back on the number they were calling from (if any such number exists)?

Not by means of reqiesting telco biling records (that would conclusively show if a call was made)?

[cinFLA]

They totally ignore all request to back up their false allegations with sources.