To: js1138
... creation science, in all its various forms, is more lucreative that genetic engineering. Well, probably a dirt-bag, low-life, slime-ball, huckster like some of those on the "creation science" lecture (and book sales) circuit can make more than a PhD biochemist.
To: PatrickHenry
Well, probably a dirt-bag, low-life, slime-ball, huckster like some of those on the "creation science" lecture (and book sales) circuit can make more than a PhD biochemist. And your job isn't easily subject to offshoring. (I'll keep it in mind.)
To: PatrickHenry
I was trying to be subtle.
35 posted on
02/22/2004 7:28:32 PM PST by
js1138
To: PatrickHenry
Well, probably a dirt-bag, low-life, slime-ball, huckster like some of those on the "creation science" lecture (and book sales) circuit can make more than a PhD biochemist. Especially if they think they don't have to pay taxes on the income.....
To: PatrickHenry
Another open-minded and tolerant Darwinist making resort to ad hominem arguments. I love it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson