Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
. . . absolutely demands that evolution be a part of the background.

I don't think so. Intelligent choices in this field can be made without the Theory of Evolution. Without a creationist viewpoint, too, for that matter.

284 posted on 02/29/2004 6:14:40 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
Intelligent choices in this field can be made without the Theory of Evolution.

One could make his choice using the "eeny, meeny, miney, moe" technique, but it wouldn't be an intelligent choice. From a creationist viewpoint, because all creatures were created at once, one could select anything at all. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't be too happy about taking a new "toad-tested" medicine, even if the creationist researcher assured me that all creatures are equally unrelated to us, so a toad is as good a test subject as an ape.

To make a truly intelligent choice, one would need to find a very closely related test subject. But once we talk about "closely related" we're in dangerous territory, aren't we? Be glad the researchers are evolutionists. You may one day have your life saved by the products of their research.

286 posted on 02/29/2004 6:26:36 PM PST by PatrickHenry (A compassionate evolutionist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson