The True Extent of Evolution's Corruption

Private Archives ^ | Feb. 22, 2004 | Reynaldo Mahatma Smith

[chickenlips]

I suggest you get a copy of "Darwin's God" by Cornelius Hunter and read it. He points out the metaphysical suppositions of Darwinism quite well. It's pretty clear Chuckie D. and the Bible aren't in agreement.

[Modernman]

A scientific theory that opposes the bible is not the same kind of science as nuclear theory. The science of origin is unique in that way.

The problem with this statement is that evolution makes no claim as to how life began. The theory of evolution only deals with what happens once life has already begun.

Suppose for a second that evolution were true and that there were no God.

Your statement here is based on the assumption that evolution takes a position as to existence or non-existence of God. Nowhere in evolution is there a claim that God exists or doesn't exist.

What would be the proper way for man to procede? How should he treat his fellow man? How should he feel about himself and his future? How should he feel about same sex marriage and socialism? I hope you see that my point here?

God either exists or he doesn't. However, evolution has no power to make him non-existent or existent. These questions you ask are certainly heady, but the theory of evolution never asks these questions.

[discostu]

Why read what someone else says. Read what Darwin himself said, he said a system of self perfection like evolution was absolute proof positive that God created the universe because there's no other way such a system could come into existence. Only the anti-evolution people see a problem with God and evolution existing together.

[Modernman]

If I and my neighbor are products of evolution and he is dragging down the human condition than how am I to react? What is the best for the species. Christians are often hated by evolutionists because we help the weak. This is viewed as contrary to survival of the fittest.

You are going back to equating social darwinism with darwinism. Yor base assumption here is that the theory of evolution somehow effects the day to day behavior of people who accept the theory. There is just no evidence of that.

[Modernman]

How does the evolutionist feel about same sex marriage. Evolution most certainly has an opinion about that.

AFAIK, gay mariage is a purely social issue which has nothing to do with the TOE.

Today the evolutionist sees the world as overpopulated and loves same sex marriage since it doesn't produce kids.

There is no proof for this statement.

[longshadow]

"Tragedy of the Tractionless Trolls" memorial placemarker

[Dimensio]

Evolution says that the supernatural can't happen and that we absolutely must trust only natural observation.

This statement has been exposed as false so many times that I cannot believe that anyone who has been around here as long as you can make it for any reason other than to state a deliberate lie.

[Dimensio]

If God says A and evolution says B, then yes it does.

So you not only know a God exists, but also exactly what this God has stated?

Well, I suppose that if you assume that a God has said something that specifically contradicts the theory of evolution, then evolution could be said to contradict that particular God. However, you would also have to rule out the existence of all other possible gods, and evolution does not do that.

[BiffWondercat]

Blaming Edison (hey, didn't he invent the phonograph - which would be later used to disseminate...ROCK MUSIC!?!)

I suppose the author will next blame the Theory of Gravity for pulling down people pants and causing (non-marital) sexual positions?

[BiffWondercat]

I thought it was two down quarks and one up, or is it two down and one up? no,no, two charm and 1/3 top +.....

Damn, you're right!

[BiffWondercat]

Now then, where (other than the internet) is the comparable "creation science" industry? Some Bookstores?

[BiffWondercat]

Maybe Bob knows?

[BiffWondercat]

Maybe Bob knows?

[BiffWondercat]

Trademark Bookmark!

[BiffWondercat]

Mecrob! Sorry for the dupe!

[VadeRetro]

Leptons aren't made of quarks. Piker!

[PatrickHenry]

I am outraged at the work of the blasphemous beast, Thomas Edison. Consider the promise of the Lord to Noah, after the Flood:

Genesis 8:22
While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.

Yet the Satanic Edison and his infernal electric light have destroyed the divine harmony of the night. Ever since Edison, we have been cursed. What has been our fate since Edison? War, sodomy, Hitler, Stalin, teen pregnancy, liberalism, socialism, income taxes, drugs, all the abominations of our current age. And Edison is the cause!!! Can't you see it? Are you blind???

Turn off your lights! Smash your light bulbs! Banish electric lights from the schools! Cleanse our land from the filthy work of Edison!!!! Let the ordained cycle of day and night be restored. God bless America!!!!!

[Virginia-American]

[Kent Hovind's]...lies that even honest creationists will debunk.

EG Arguments we think creationists should NOT use from "Answers in Genesis", a creationist web site.

"honest creationists" are usually called "evolutionists."

[Virginia-American]

Christians are often hated by evolutionists because we help the weak. This is viewed as contrary to survival of the fittest.

Of course, you can provide cites for this claim.

[biblewonk]

I have read the bible through about 50 times in the last 20 years. I read it every day. It is simply the inspired and inerrant Word of God. To read the bible is to listen to God tell you about Himself and yourself. But how did we get there from where we started? I guess I was trying to prove that any belief that challenges another belief is in the same category. This is why evolution is religion.

I had an analogy come to mind. Spose someone said that when you drop a hammer and a feather they land at different times but the explanation is not in a scientific one. Infact the whole discussion as to why the feather falls slower is in a category that is not science. This wouldn't work would it. It may be a different aspect of science but it is still science.