RALLY REPORT - Kaloogian and Tancredo ROCK Republican Convention in California!

So in other words equate it with the clitonites supporting all their president did although we know this policy is wrong? When will people get the difference between being angry about an issue, ah nevermind, what's the use?

201 posted on 02/23/2004 4:13:07 AM PST by JustPiper (The fly cannot be driven away by getting angry at it)

To: KantianBurke; Carry_Okie

Carry did put it in plain english didn't she? Will it be understood? No!

202 posted on 02/23/2004 4:14:19 AM PST by JustPiper (The fly cannot be driven away by getting angry at it)

What is sad is many of those who now harangue us, started out on the same side, but when we stayed steadfast with the issue, and they assumed it meant we were wrong, last I looked this was America and no one agree's with any President 100% of the time except dims.

203 posted on 02/23/2004 4:16:07 AM PST by JustPiper (The fly cannot be driven away by getting angry at it)

Great.

Now, all Kaloogian needs to do to win in November is to make sure that no Democrats are allowed to vote.

204 posted on 02/23/2004 4:17:25 AM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)

For the team to win, we must play like a team

We all were a team, but odd thing is we stayed loyal to the issue and not a single man.

205 posted on 02/23/2004 4:19:37 AM PST by JustPiper (The fly cannot be driven away by getting angry at it)

To: american spirit

Shamnesty and Hispandering

206 posted on 02/23/2004 4:21:01 AM PST by JustPiper (The fly cannot be driven away by getting angry at it)

Hundreds of GOP loyalists booed the president at a rally where U.S. Senate hopeful Howard Kaloogian and his allies denounced Bush's plan to give temporary legal status to undocumented workers.

If Kaloogian didn't chastise the mob for booing the President, then he deserves to lose on March 2nd.

207 posted on 02/23/2004 4:22:40 AM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)

the media attention only helps the Democrats

The media attention IS the Democrats. You cannot say the media is liberally biased and not realise we are not going to change the media for goodness sake.

208 posted on 02/23/2004 4:23:40 AM PST by JustPiper (The fly cannot be driven away by getting angry at it)

'walking on eggshells' thing

BTTT!

209 posted on 02/23/2004 4:24:27 AM PST by JustPiper (The fly cannot be driven away by getting angry at it)

Rummy would 'mine' the border's ;)

210 posted on 02/23/2004 4:25:34 AM PST by JustPiper (The fly cannot be driven away by getting angry at it)

To: FairOpinion; All

(If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)

What?!? That's a tagline?! What?!

211 posted on 02/23/2004 4:26:33 AM PST by JustPiper (The fly cannot be driven away by getting angry at it)

To: ETERNAL WARMING

212 posted on 02/23/2004 4:29:05 AM PST by JustPiper (The fly cannot be driven away by getting angry at it)

To: JustPiper; hchutch; PRND21

Rummy would 'mine' the border's ;)

Actually, he wouldn't, because he's got more brains than you do.

How long do you think a policy of mining the borders would last?

Say, until America gets to see CNN footage of little Jose, who just got his legs blown off, as they're eating breakfast?

Or maybe you'd prefer that it be some American citizen who gets his legs blown off, and shown on national TV? That would REALLY generate support for mining the borders.

213 posted on 02/23/2004 4:32:11 AM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)

To: chicagolady; Impeach98

You have no idea how glad I am Impeach posted this

214 posted on 02/23/2004 4:39:47 AM PST by JustPiper (The fly cannot be driven away by getting angry at it)

If Kaloogian didn't chastise the mob for booing the President, then he deserves to lose on March 2nd.

Certainly! The little people need to learn there place, shut up and vote. Right?

By the way, Rep. Shadegg (R) came down to Rep. Kolbe's (RINO) district in Arizona Saturday night as the special guest speaker at the GOP Lincoln Day Dinner. During his remarks he mentioned that he "respects" Kolbe. He was met with an unexpected hail of loud boos and hisses from what is usually a polite crowd. He didn't chastize the crowd. Should he lose the Primary too? He's lucky he didn't bring up his support for the Bush/Rove amnesty plan or he might have had things thrown at him.

215 posted on 02/23/2004 5:36:51 AM PST by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)

there place = their place

excuse: I'm posting from my PocketPC

216 posted on 02/23/2004 5:38:34 AM PST by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)

In his campaign, Arnold was always forthright that he opposed the lack of security provisions and not driver's licenses for illegal in general

Oh...yeah, that's right. I remember now! You're right: Arnie never came back and said "I oppose driver's licenses for illegals". He always said, "I oppose driver's licenses for illegals if they haven't had a thourough, comprehensive background check by the Mexican goberment to determine if they are breaking any law, or have ever in de past".

Well, I stand chastized! The Dual National from Oesterreich has my renewed respect! Why, he won't give a foreign national "not completely where they are supposed to be" (to use Ms. Pelosi's tortured words) the benefits of U.S. Citizenship until he and the Inspector Clouseau Memorial Background Check Unit try to determine if this person in the United States Illegally is a criminal....hmmm...wait...illegal...Mon Dieu! We have it, Governor Arnold! We suspect that they may be a criminal because...because...they are here illegally!! Whew, that was hard...

Hey, Junky, buzz off. The whole Background Check thing is a sham that's as ludicrous as the Mexican Matricula Consular. It was dreamed up by the Mexican government and their fifth column in this country to try and stave off citizen anger after 9/11, when they realized that their 30 year initiative to subvert the laws of the U.S. and legitimize their colonization was gonna get derailed. That's all. There won't be any "background check" because a) The people in the country illegally don't have any "background" here to check, b) Mexico can't, won't and never would agree to any such thing, and if they did, they'd lie about every single one, and c) As soon as you do the "background check" you will find yourself confronted with one uncontrovertible fact: the person you are investigating is a deportable criminal by definition. PERIOD.

Take your staged indignation and save it for a Mime Troop event. That's about your speed.

217 posted on 02/23/2004 5:54:38 AM PST by Regulator

218 posted on 02/23/2004 6:09:07 AM PST by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)

Can someone pronounce the candidate's name using capital letters for the sounds?

219 posted on 02/23/2004 6:36:47 AM PST by Theodore R. (When will they ever learn?)

"The semi-annual California Republican Party Convention..."

The California GOP has a convention twice a year?

220 posted on 02/23/2004 7:15:46 AM PST by Redbob

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794