Skip to comments.
No deal on returning migrants to Mexico
tucson citizen ^
| 2/21/04
Posted on 02/21/2004 6:18:26 PM PST by knak
Edited on 05/07/2004 5:38:08 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
MEXICO CITY - Top Homeland Security Department officials and their Mexican counterparts completed two days of talks here yesterday but did not reach agreement on a proposed U.S. deportation program.
Under the controversial proposal, tens of thousands of illegal Mexican immigrants caught along the U.S.-Mexico border would be flown into the country's interior and repatriated there.
(Excerpt) Read more at tucsoncitizen.com ...
TOPICS: Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; deportation; immigrantlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
02/21/2004 6:18:27 PM PST
by
knak
To: knak
Bump...
2
posted on
02/21/2004 6:23:53 PM PST
by
tubebender
(Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see...)
To: knak
Here's my plan for returning the deported illegals to Mexico:
I can promise a 0% recidivism rate. Quite a bargain. May I get some funding now?
3
posted on
02/21/2004 6:24:02 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(I'm pro-choice. I just think the "choice" should be made *before* having sex.)
To: knak; keri; international american; Kay Soze; jpsb; hershey; TomInNJ; dagnabbit; Pro-Bush; ...
"Mexico and the United States also agreed to cooperate in arresting and prosecuting human smugglers, fighting border violence, and speeding car and truck traffic along the border.
They will create new dedicated commuter lanes this year at Nogales; San Ysidro and Calexico, Calif.; and El Paso, Laredo, and Brownsville, Texas.
To improve truck traffic, the two countries will establish Free and Secure Trade lanes at Pharr and Brownsville, Texas; Calexico and Otay Mesa, Calif.; and Nogales."
There's that GIANT SUCKING SOUND all over again folks.
This is how many hundred of "agreements" now by Mexico "promising" to contain the migrant invasion on their side of the border?
Mexico plays Washington like a cheap Spanish guitar - regardless of who sits in the Oval Office, this condition is a curse we may all just have to live with until critical mass is reached.
4
posted on
02/21/2004 6:25:50 PM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
To: Sabertooth
Ping...
5
posted on
02/21/2004 6:27:28 PM PST
by
TomServo
("What a day. I invented Gainesburgers and I didn't even mean to!")
To: Prime Choice
That is funny!
6
posted on
02/21/2004 6:34:59 PM PST
by
FITZ
To: FairOpinion
Where's your beloved deal now?
7
posted on
02/21/2004 7:04:09 PM PST
by
raybbr
(My 1.4 cents - It used to be 2 cents, but after taxes - you get the idea.)
To: raybbr
"The Bush administration has been negotiating with the Mexican government since last summer on returning Mexicans to cities farther from the U.S. border and closer to their homes.
Administration officials say a similar program was effective in the early 1990s in combating illegal immigration along the border near San Diego."
====
They are working on it, but the Mexicans are hard to negotiate with. These things take time. Apparently it looked like they had a deal earlier and it fell apart -- but they are still negotiating, and that's a good sign.
8
posted on
02/21/2004 7:30:00 PM PST
by
FairOpinion
(If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
To: knak
Yet another reason to reject Bushs amnesty proposal. Looks as if the administration had hoped to appease the public with this agreement. One of the many reasons why there is nothing more permanent than a temporary worker. There is practically no enforcement now, why would be any different in the future. Bush will still keep pushing his amnesty plan anyway.
9
posted on
02/21/2004 7:54:23 PM PST
by
hawk1
To: Prime Choice
That picture should be mailed to the INS and Border patrol suggestion box.
10
posted on
02/21/2004 7:56:04 PM PST
by
hawk1
To: knak
The two governments agreed to create a joint working group to explore ways to return Mexicans caught...Planes, trains, and automobiles...barges, freighters, size ten steel-tipped boots...
To: Prime Choice
Heh -- That'll work!
To: JustPiper; Gallegos; HiJinx; janetgreen; FITZ; gubamyster; SandRat; WRhine; joesnuffy; B4Ranch; ...
Here we go again ping.
13
posted on
02/21/2004 8:11:28 PM PST
by
Missouri
To: hawk1
Looks as if the administration had hoped to appease the public with this agreementIt appeased a whole bunch of um the other night. Of course anyone with a brain could see as one poster stated, they are just lipsticken the pig. I think it was Saber. LOL.....
14
posted on
02/21/2004 8:22:02 PM PST
by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: knak
Top Homeland Security Department officials and their Mexican counterparts completed two days of talks here yesterday but did not reach agreement on a proposed U.S. deportation program. Here is what you do: Mexico just announced that they are Cong to charge a 35% tax on money wired from the USA to Mexico for about $13 Billion revenue a year. Unless Mexico takes back whoever we send them and stops aiding illegals to get here the amount that can be sent in a month will be limited or the program stopped.
There would be a revolution in Mexico within 6 months if those transfers were modified.
To: Happy2BMe
Mexico plays Washington like a cheap Spanish guitar - regardless of who sits in the Oval Office, this condition is a curse we may all just have to live with until critical mass is reached.
When do you think critical mass might be reached? I think it might happened before the Presidental Election after this current Presidental Election.
To: Prime Choice
Nice trebuchet.
17
posted on
02/21/2004 8:32:05 PM PST
by
Consort
To: Mike Darancette; Missouri; JustPiper
There would be a revolution in Mexico within 6 months if those transfers were modified. There would be a revolution in the American banking industry if that happened. Wells Fargo and Bank of America are collecting hugh sums of money from expatriates by charging a fee to make the remissions transfers.
18
posted on
02/21/2004 8:35:58 PM PST
by
HiJinx
(God Bless our Troops...)
To: knak
Sheesh!
Why can't this administration figure out how to deal with Fox & the invaders he sponsors?
Forget "negotiating" with the Mex. Thug Gov.
Step ONE! Make all illegal entry into the U.S. a FELONY on first offence!
ALL such felons to lose ANY chance of EVER becoming a U.S. citizen!
ALL such invaders to be permanently barred from gaining voting rights in the U.S.!
Just load the d*** illegal invaders on ships, retired ocean liners or battle cruisers, whatever can be found to do the job.
Cruise them to the Mex. coastal point furthest from the U.S. and kick them off.
Transporting them in mass numbers, by boat, will be much cheaper than plane tickets.
If Fox and his socialist thugs have a problem with that, start repealing provisions of NAFTA until they get the message!
Start with the free passage of Mex. trucks, cancel the border commute lanes, and continue with higher duties on Mex. goods to repay the cost of border enforcement.
It really is NOT that hard to figure out, we simply have to remove the incentive for V. Fox and his thugs to continue exporting their problems to the U.S.
19
posted on
02/21/2004 8:36:35 PM PST
by
Richard-SIA
(Nuke the U.N!)
To: Joe Hadenuf
20
posted on
02/21/2004 9:20:21 PM PST
by
Missouri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson