Skip to comments.
Is British National Gallery's New Raphael a Fake?
Reuters ^
| 2-20-2004
Posted on 02/20/2004 2:53:27 PM PST by nuconvert
Is British National Gallery's New Raphael a Fake?
Feb.20, 2004
LONDON (Reuters) - A Raphael painting bought by Britain's National Gallery this month for $41.7 million is a fake, a U.S. art professor says.
The gallery secured the "Madonna of the Pinks," which it called the most significant Old Master in any British collection, after a fight to keep it in the country.
But James Beck, Professor of Art History at Columbia University in New York and the President of ArtWatch International, told Friday's edition of the Times the gallery had paid "a record price for a fake."
"They haven't done their homework," Beck said. "It's a disgrace. The National Gallery never checked any of them physically.
"When you're spending government money, or anyone's money it's an omission. Frankly, it's a kind of arrogance of the Establishment."
The picture, so called because it depicts the Virgin Mary with a sprig of pink flowers, was bought from the Duke of Northumberland.
An ancestor of the Duke bought the 1507-8 picture in 1853 but it was long considered a copy until 1991 when Nicholas Penny, the Gallery's curator, examined the picture and hailed it as the rediscovered masterpiece.
Beck told the paper his research led him to believe the painting was in fact made in 1827 by Vincenzo Camuccini, a frequent copyist of Raphael and a recognized faker.
"I think he did this not only for money, but to compete with the Great Masters and fool the public," he said.
The Gallery has listed 40 versions of the painting around the world, while Beck said he had found at least five more. Beck said he believed none of the surviving versions was by Raphael.
The Gallery has said the picture, which measures just 11.4 by nine inches, had a different finish and coloring to other Raphael's but added it followed the advice of 25 Raphael experts who all confirmed the attribution.
The gallery's $41.7 million was raised jointly by Britain's National Lottery and donations from the public.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ai; camuccini; godsgravesglyphs; london; madonnaofthepinks; museum; nationalgallery; painting; raphael; renaissance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Bummer
1
posted on
02/20/2004 2:53:27 PM PST
by
nuconvert
To: nuconvert
ouch!!
2
posted on
02/20/2004 2:55:13 PM PST
by
mylife
To: nuconvert
3
posted on
02/20/2004 2:56:17 PM PST
by
nuconvert
("Progress was all right. Only it went on too long.")
To: nuconvert
To: nuconvert
5
posted on
02/20/2004 2:57:09 PM PST
by
mylife
To: mylife
That's as bad as some of these baseball or bassaball teams paying about that much for a player's annual salary, only to have him blow out a knee (or a nostril)...
6
posted on
02/20/2004 2:57:30 PM PST
by
ErnBatavia
(Gay marriage is for suckers...)
To: mosel-saar-ruwer; mylife
pictures, pictures everywhere........
It's a very nice painting........kind of expensive
7
posted on
02/20/2004 2:59:06 PM PST
by
nuconvert
("Progress was all right. Only it went on too long.")
To: nuconvert
with the zoom fuction on that link you can actually see brushstrokes
8
posted on
02/20/2004 3:01:44 PM PST
by
mylife
To: nuconvert
Odd for Raphael to paint something so small. He was known for his barn-sized oils.
9
posted on
02/20/2004 3:04:43 PM PST
by
EggsAckley
({....YES... I AM THE HATED......troll patrol.....(on duty).....})
To: nuconvert
Looks more like a Da Vinci than a Rapheal...
10
posted on
02/20/2004 3:05:01 PM PST
by
kesg
To: mylife
Oh?
I'll try that. Thanks.
11
posted on
02/20/2004 3:05:16 PM PST
by
nuconvert
("Progress was all right. Only it went on too long.")
To: kesg
Ii was liberaly based on a da vinci
12
posted on
02/20/2004 3:06:00 PM PST
by
mylife
To: kesg
So you think they were ripped off?
13
posted on
02/20/2004 3:06:22 PM PST
by
nuconvert
("Progress was all right. Only it went on too long.")
To: kesg
This painting is freely based on a famous composition by Leonardo da Vinci (the 'Benois Madonna' in the Hermitage, St Petersburg. Raphael painted the panel shortly before leaving Florence for Rome. When it was in the Camuccini Collection in Italy it was celebrated, but for more than a century it was thought to be only a copy.
Oil on wood
29 x 23 cm.
14
posted on
02/20/2004 3:07:33 PM PST
by
mylife
To: mylife
15
posted on
02/20/2004 3:10:43 PM PST
by
mylife
To: nuconvert
Doesn't look fake to me.
16
posted on
02/20/2004 3:20:34 PM PST
by
FReepaholic
(Never Forget: www.september-11-videos.com)
To: ErnBatavia
Actually this is worse. At least in the athlete situation the team got what they wanted ....with the only problem being that the athlete got injured. In this case the gallery forked over millions for a fake. That would be comparable to the NY Yankees paying millions for A-Rod, only to get someone who just looks like A-Rod.
17
posted on
02/20/2004 3:40:34 PM PST
by
spetznaz
(Nuclear missiles: The ultimate Phallic symbol.)
To: spetznaz
It would be the same as paying for A-Rod and having H-Rod show up.
The first clue something would be amiss: H-Rod tells Jeter to move to 3B so she and Crusty can play SS.
To: nuconvert
So it wasn't painted by Rafael, but by someone else who was just as good.
To: LouisianaLobster
Right.....but that doesn't count when you're talking about it's value. Almost-a-Raphael doesn't quite make it.
Now, would I mind having it? Absoltely not.
20
posted on
02/20/2004 4:54:50 PM PST
by
nuconvert
("Progress was all right. Only it went on too long.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson