John Kerry Girl Tells All

The Sun ^ | 2/15/04 | BRIAN FLYNN

[lunatic12]

THE beauty said to have had a fling with presidential hopeful John Kerry has recorded a bombshell tell-all interview.

Journalist Alex Polier taped a talk with a US TV network at Christmas.

The former Washington intern, 27, told all about an alleged fling with the 60-year-old super-rich senator in spring 2001.

The channel is sitting on the tape until it has enough evidence to back her story. If the sex claims are true, they would shatter his White House hopes. Kerry, a married dad of two, has denied the fling. But Alex told pals she fled to Kenya on his suggestion.

One TV source said: “She wants to tell her story. She has talked at length about her relationship with Kerry. But no one is believing her.”

Kerry was front-runner for the Democratic nomination to take on George Bush in November. His hopes were hit as hints of a scandal emerged.

[Prince Charles]

Journalist Alex Polier taped a talk with a US TV network at Christmas.

So which radical leftist media organ is sitting on this tape?

[texasbluebell]

I'd LOVE to see their prenup!

You said it! No kidding! I'd love to see what he agreed to.

[CyberAnt]

Don't worry .. public is catching on!

[Time4Atlas2Shrug]

If this story explodes, I hope the Republican Party has the sense to handle it like a hot potato. It is distracting people from why our national security will be in jeopardy if Kerry is elected. We already know that libs do not care about values in a president. They want One World and we want sovereignty and safety from the third world savages who would do us harm.

[GretchenEE]

I think the biggest aspect of the timing of this is Kerry was having an affair while sitting in judgement of Clinton. the timing is amazing.....

I think a lot of the wizards of Oz are going to find Toto pulling the curtain away soon in DC.

[Mike Darancette]

You want to find out what happened? Have Linda Tripp ring her up.

[texasbluebell]

Prostate surgery which I think was in Feb 2003.

[woofie]

The prenup states Kerry gets to keep 3 cases of ketchup

[CyberAnt]

"he's now got world-wide free ads"

Good point!

[HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity]

The libs will run the Clinton/Gary Hart/JFK playbook:

They will argue that Kerry's mistreatment of women does not "interfere" with his ability to deliberate on public policy. That liberals are gifted with an Olympian Dionysian sex drive(fantasy, delusion of grandeur). That we live in an enlightened age of metrosexual liberation, so this really doesn't matter. And, hey, she probably wanted it and enjoyed it, etc. If that fails, they will run the "Stalker" psycho line (as with Monica). They will demonize the critics and whine about the Vast-Right-Wing Conspiracy of gun nuts, white supremacist Idaho hillbillies, and fundamentalists. Same old story.

[JohnnyZ]

Drudge is great at getting the mainstream press to actually report what they have.

I think elements of the mainstream press were who leaked it to Drudge, perhaps through channels (ie Lehane). THEY have a story (which is what reporters care about more than politics), but their editors won't let them report it without proof; they need things to be fairly out in the open, have some justification beyond unsubstantiated allegations.

As has been pointed out, there's no court case, no charges, no nuthin', unlike the Lewinsky scandal. All they have to work with at this point are unsupported allegations and non-denial denials, but now that the water is well and truly bloodied I think all will come out eventually.

[Time4Atlas2Shrug]

Ms. Kerry may not be running for president, but neither was Hillary and look at what influence she weilded. Remember "we are the president!"? The first lady has EVERYTHING to do with the man who holds the office. Presumably he is married to someone who shares his agenda. If Laura Bush had the affiliations that Ms. Kerry has, would you think it relevant? I personally would.

I still think pointing out the record of Kerry and highlighting his wife's connections is important and it is perfectly reasonable to expect that the Bush campaign illustrate why he is unfit for the office with REASONS. Reasons are not attacks. Accusing the president of being AWOL when he was not is an attack. Educating the public about the record of the opponent and the radical agenda of his wife's organization is important and one cannot rely upon the media to detail Kerry's record. How often have you heard about Kerry's post-war actions (other than "he protested") in the press?

He needs to stop responding and make the other side respond.

[texasbluebell]

Only three? What a sucker he is.

[dmzTahoe]

Under normal circumstances, you may be correct. What you are forgetting is we are talking about abnormal situations having to do with the Democrats, led by the Clinton Machine, where Rule of Law, ethics or fear of harm to the nation do not apply.

The exact case can be made by the New Jersey fiasco, where everyone said it could not be done, that the law would not allow it to happen. We know the results. Be very afraid!

[Mo1]

Ms. Kerry may not be running for president, but neither was Hillary and look at what influence she weilded. Remember "we are the president!"? The first lady has EVERYTHING to do with the man who holds the office. Presumably he is married to someone who shares his agenda. If Laura Bush had the affiliations that Ms. Kerry has, would you think it relevant? I personally would.

I agree with you and yes it is relevant

I'm just saying he will not go on the attack of her

He'll make his points in other ways, but he won't attack her

He needs to stop responding and make the other side respond

He will .. but not the way you want him to

You just watch how he handles these doofs

[CyberAnt]

"notes/letters/emails from Lurch"

Yeah, I remember reading that too.

[Time4Atlas2Shrug]

I hope he does respond. I understand that it is to early to play his hand, yet I hope he doesn't wait too long, either. This has been an unusually long full-force election season and he has been right so far to not respond to Kerry directly as until recently he didn't appear to have the nomination sealed. But Mr. Vietnam needs to be made to understand that this is not 1969 - it is 2004 and things are not even as neat as that sloppy war. Suicide bombers are coming to a theater near you and slick political talk will not change that fact, only reminding a complacent public will accomplish the defeat of the infection of Islamic extremism.

He doesn't have to do it the way I want - he just has to do it or he will not win. Everyone is comfy and most people do not know a 9/11 victim. People are whining about airport lines, now.

[Mo1]

People will always whine about something

With that said .. they do trust Bush

[Badray]

"Flattery will get you everywhere! ;D"

Oh, yeah?!?!? Did I say how lovely you look tonight?