Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/15/2004 5:50:33 PM PST by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Pikamax
one party rule has a tendency to produce this type of corruption
2 posted on 02/15/2004 5:54:11 PM PST by raloxk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
Let's just get this behind us so we can get back to hating Bush full time.

"Nothing like this has hit the Liberal party in quite a long time," said the open-line host. "The outcry has been astonishing, down on the street, in people's homes and in 1,000 offices."

4 posted on 02/15/2004 6:01:18 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
"If the question is, did I know that people were kiting cheques, that people were making payments that were inappropriate, did I know all of those things? The answer is absolutely not. I did not know that."

Quite frankly, the idea that the Minister of Finance - simultaneously the most senior cabinet minister under the Prime Minister and the holder of the federal moneybags - knew nothing about this strains credulity almost to the breaking point.

Martin was more charitable Sunday, calling Chrétien a man of "unquestioned integrity" and saying he's sure his former boss was not personally involved in the scandal.

Bushwah. It's been a number of years since I would have said that of Chrétien personally. He himself was the target of accusations of conflict of interest over the so-called "Shawinagate" scandal: federal money granted to a hotel in his home riding of Shawinagan, of which he was once part owner, and which neighboured a golf course in which technically he was still a shareholder. This sponsorship thing is not a new scandal; it's been around for at least a couple of years. Of course, Chrétien also has a track record of shuffling his feet on issues of Parliamentary ethics.

5 posted on 02/15/2004 6:11:35 PM PST by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
'... boldly promising to resign if a public inquiry shows he had prior knowledge of a sponsorship scandal ...'

Help Wanted ... one Prime Minister. Liberals need not apply.
7 posted on 02/16/2004 7:14:45 AM PST by NorthOf45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
These two paragraphs say a lot:

""Did I hear rumours, were there articles in the newspapers that obviously I read about this?" Martin asked rhetorically. "Clearly, yes, I did hear rumours. I read the articles in the newspapers.

" "If the question is, did I know that people were kiting cheques, that people were making payments that were inappropriate, did I know all of those things? The answer is absolutely not. I did not know that." "

So Martin is saying that he did read about this and hear about it but that he did not bother to find out anything. Either the guy is corrupt or he is incompetent. He *should* resign.

8 posted on 02/16/2004 8:58:04 AM PST by Sunsong (John Kerry, who rose without a trace, with no accomplishments but his own advancement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pikamax
As far as I'm concerned, the Canadians can go cry in their milk. They elected and re-elected these liberal scumbags for years and now - - shock! - - they have just discovered that the liberals they elected are lying scumbags and crooks, just like the liberals in the United States?

Gimme a break.

They're whining about being ripped off of $100 million but barely a peep about the $200 million (and climbing) ripoff known as "the gun registry boondoggle".

Wake me up if and when Canada ever gets it's collective head out of its butt.
16 posted on 02/21/2004 9:27:55 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson