Skip to comments.
MARS rover - Daily Updates - February 12, 2004
NASA - JPL ^
| 2-12-04
| NASA/JPL
Posted on 02/12/2004 7:40:17 PM PST by Phil V.
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Microscopic Imager Non-linearized Full frame EDR acquired on Sol 39 of Spirit's mission to Gusev Crater at approximately at approximately 10:04:57 Mars local solar time, Microscopic Imager dust cover commanded to be OPEN. NASA/JPL/Cornell/USGS
View Full Image
I'm surprised that NASA/JPL has not commented about "spheres" at Spirit's site. Apparently these items are a planet wide phenomenon.
1
posted on
02/12/2004 7:40:19 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: xm177e2; XBob; wirestripper; whattajoke; VOR78; Virginia-American; Vinnie_Vidi_Vici; VadeRetro; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this MARS ping list please FRail me
2
posted on
02/12/2004 7:41:21 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: Phil V.
frog prints!!
3
posted on
02/12/2004 7:44:02 PM PST
by
GeronL
(www.ArmorforCongress.com ............... Support a FReeper for Congress)
To: Phil V.
Gravel. It looks like friggin' gravel. If these rovers are so sophisticated, why haven't they ground one up and analyzed it yet?
To: Phil V.
Dude, that is the kooldecking beside my pool!
5
posted on
02/12/2004 7:46:22 PM PST
by
Central Scrutiniser
(Be oblong and have your knees removed...)
To: Phil V.
I'm surprised that NASA/JPL has not commented about "spheres" at Spirit's site.
They were discussed at great length during the Feb. 9 news conference (archived at cspan.org).
You have to remember that geologists, with the exception of vulcanologists at dangerous volcanoes (a TINY fraction of geologists) work and think VERY slowly.
When a field geologist gets a PhD he'll spend YEARS walking all over a surprisingly small area of the earth (bigger than the area either Opportunity or Spirit have roved so far, but still pretty small) examining EVERY outcrop in detail, turning over and over in his head how everything got there and the sequence of geological events in that location, possibily going back BILLIONS of years.
And the rovers gather info and cover ground at a FRACTION of the rate a human would walking around on earth.
Give them a break. You're not going to see new conclusions and analyses from geologists every day. People could be debating what Opportunity has found for YEARS before final conclusions are reached. Geologists are careful, and they like to be sure what they are saying, because in geology you work with such incomplete info.
6
posted on
02/12/2004 7:48:02 PM PST
by
John H K
To: Phil V.
could you put me on the mars ping list please?
Thanks!
To: Phil V.

This makes it look like Opportunity is finished at the rock outcrop. Is that right?
stereo set . . . Spirit . . . somewhere in Nevada? . . .
9
posted on
02/12/2004 8:32:14 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: LibWhacker
No. Opportunity is just casing the joint. It'll spend many days there.
10
posted on
02/12/2004 8:35:18 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: Phil V.
Anybody else see this as depressions in the ground rather than gravel? This is a classic optical illusion.
11
posted on
02/12/2004 8:35:32 PM PST
by
js1138
To: js1138
yes. My first view saw concave rather than convex.
12
posted on
02/12/2004 8:43:15 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: js1138
Anybody else see this as depressions in the ground rather than gravel? Looks to me like someone pressed pennies, nickles, dimes, quarters and half dollars into the soil.
Martian foreign exchange?
13
posted on
02/12/2004 8:44:24 PM PST
by
steve86
To: BearWash
Try turning your monitor upside down.
14
posted on
02/12/2004 8:45:08 PM PST
by
js1138
To: js1138
Try turning your monitor upside down. I was going to turn it inside out.
15
posted on
02/12/2004 8:46:11 PM PST
by
steve86
To: js1138
Anybody else see this as depressions in the ground rather than gravel? This is a classic optical illusion.Yes, at first. But I turned my laptop upside- down to correct it, and after that I could always see it correctly, even right side up.
To: Phil V.
BUMP!
Thanks for all the pings!
Keep em coming
Any fossils been found yet?
17
posted on
02/12/2004 9:04:30 PM PST
by
NYTexan
(If a UFO scops down on ya, RUN LIKE HELL!!!! (you ain't first contat material! LOL))
another stereo set . . .
18
posted on
02/12/2004 9:08:29 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: Phil V.; All
Sorry for being gone so long all. I have been up to my eyebrows in quaternions, Kalman filtering, rotational acceleration, angular rates, etc.
To: John H K; Phil V.
Geologists are careful, and they like to be sure what they are saying, because in geology you work with such incomplete info. In addition JPL's Marsologists ("geo" is the Latin root for "Earth") have to infer planet-building-and-altering processes on a body with about 1/3 Earth gravity which could alter them a lot from Earth norm. They have no absolute proof that water ever existed there (again, only an inference from topology, etc.) and the atmosphere is entirely different. The average temperature around the planet is far colder than Earth's. All these matters and many others have to be taken into account before any theories are put forward. Here on FR we have a lot of fun playing at "science" but most of us don't really know what the hell we're doing.
20
posted on
02/12/2004 9:17:09 PM PST
by
Bernard Marx
(In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson