Skip to comments.
Conservatives Need to Get Real
The Intellectual Conservative ^
| 02 February 2004
| Scott Shore
Posted on 02/11/2004 11:00:20 AM PST by Lando Lincoln
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 821-831 next last
To: OWK
I am a completely honest person, OWK.
Read the rest of my post.
461
posted on
02/12/2004 7:42:46 AM PST
by
ohioWfan
(BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
To: ohioWfan
My question is, if these people are so purely conservative, why doesn't the thought of a REAL leftist in the White House make them sick... It does.
That's what we're trying to tell you.
462
posted on
02/12/2004 7:43:23 AM PST
by
OWK
(Have you accepted George as your personal president?)
To: OWK
I started on FR in 97. Wore a red hat at the March for Justice, personally met just about everyone on FR at the time, have been a consistent and unwavering defender of my principles on this website for 7 or 8 years... and it was all so I could establish a deep cover as a DU troll operative, and spring a trap on you dupes in this very thread making you all look like fools trying to defend a leftist.I knew it! I always knew it! I always knew it,,,,,, I always knew it,,see? I told ya so!,,,,,,
463
posted on
02/12/2004 7:44:20 AM PST
by
Protagoras
(When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
To: Diddle E. Squat
"you really believe that no citizens are traitors, none have become sleeper terrorists?"
I could care less who they vote for. What, do you think Bush should pander to them too?
National security is more than just going overseas and taking out terrorists there. Stopping illegal immigration; going after people that have overstayed their visas; protecting a citizens rights to keep and bear arms; taking the TSA to task for making it difficult for pilots to be armed; adding more immigration agents/patrols; leaning on agencies that refuse to turn over illegals. There are other things also. Sure you can say that the dems won't do it either, but if we don't voice our distaste for the way things are going on what will change? If you don't tell someone that they are doing something you don't like, how will they know?
464
posted on
02/12/2004 7:44:29 AM PST
by
looscnnn
(Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
To: OWK
Cute.
You think you're very smart, and very pure, but you aren't bothered by the thought of a leftist anti-American, anti-military crackpot in the White House.
Peculiar.
465
posted on
02/12/2004 7:45:13 AM PST
by
ohioWfan
(BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
To: OWK
Give me a break, OWK.
You cannot, if you are sober and in your right mind, say that Bush is a leftist like Kerry is.
He may not be as pure as you would like, but to say he has done nothing conservative is nothing but garbage.
Just a question........a serious one. Are you for or against supporting the military?
466
posted on
02/12/2004 7:49:09 AM PST
by
ohioWfan
(BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
To: Howlin
Don't talk to me about taking shots.
So, you've had them?
|
467
posted on
02/12/2004 7:49:29 AM PST
by
Sabertooth
(Sharpen your Long Knives lately?)
To: George W. Bush
Oh, excuse me, you didn't say he wasn't a Christian, you said he was a GOOD ENOUGH ONE to suit you.
And you linked to this web site:
BushRevealed.com
Where THEY say:
Welcome to BushRevealed.com!
This website serves as notice to Christians across this nation that President George Bush over the past few years has compromised his "Christian faith" by promoting evil and openly supporting wickedness. It is our hope and prayer that he would Repent and turn from such blatant sin. He is not our friend and cannot be trusted.
This website is dedicated to providing up-to-date factual news information tracking the president's anti-Christian and ungodly behavior. We encourage you to pray for Mr. Bush.
I'm sure that since you don't think Bush is a good enough Chritian to suit you, you could never believe he'd be a good president either!
468
posted on
02/12/2004 7:50:42 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: George W. Bush
Oh, excuse me, you didn't say he wasn't a Christian, you said he was a GOOD ENOUGH ONE to suit you.
And you linked to this web site:
BushRevealed.com
Where THEY say:
Welcome to BushRevealed.com!
This website serves as notice to Christians across this nation that President George Bush over the past few years has compromised his "Christian faith" by promoting evil and openly supporting wickedness. It is our hope and prayer that he would Repent and turn from such blatant sin. He is not our friend and cannot be trusted.
This website is dedicated to providing up-to-date factual news information tracking the president's anti-Christian and ungodly behavior. We encourage you to pray for Mr. Bush.
I'm sure that since you don't think Bush is a good enough Chritian to suit you, you could never believe he'd be a good president either!
469
posted on
02/12/2004 7:50:55 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: All
Anyone know what Drudge is going to break.... "Campaign drama rocks Demoncrats"??? some world exclusive...
To: Sabertooth
Take your gratuitous icon and shove it where the sun don't shine.
471
posted on
02/12/2004 7:53:34 AM PST
by
Howlin
To: OWK
If you're so concerned about leftist and socialist policies in America... why don't you ever criticize them? I have .. but I guess you were too busy helping to get Kerry elected
GO KERRY GO!!!!
Oh and before you claim I didn't answer your question .. I wasn't thrilled about CFR, but at the same time, I understand why it was need and then there was parts of the prescription drugs that also bothered me .. there are some parts of his his illegal proposal that need work
Now with all that said .. I know from Kerry's history and voting records .. We will be bending over for a looooooong time
But hey GO KERRY GO!!!
472
posted on
02/12/2004 7:56:15 AM PST
by
Mo1
(" Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?")
To: ohioWfan
My question is, if these people are so purely conservative, why doesn't the thought of a REAL leftist in the White House make them sick, like it does the rest of us?? That's a very good question ... because it makes absolutely no sense to me
473
posted on
02/12/2004 7:58:22 AM PST
by
Mo1
(" Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?")
To: Mo1
Oh and before you claim I didn't answer your question .. I wasn't thrilled about CFR, but at the same time, I understand why it was need and then there was parts of the prescription drugs that also bothered me .. there are some parts of his his illegal proposal that need work Wasn't thrilled?
A little bothered by?
Needed some work?
You don't object to ANY of these things in principle... do you?
474
posted on
02/12/2004 8:00:09 AM PST
by
OWK
(Have you accepted George as your personal president?)
To: Mo1
What amazes me most about these purists, is that, if they were on this forum back in 97 or 98, they HAD to be opposed to xlinton.
And NOW, they are so mad that Bush isn't conservative enough for them, that they are willing to let a guy who is LEFT of xlinton take the White House to teach Bush a lesson.
Does this make sense to any conservative who can think straight??
475
posted on
02/12/2004 8:02:34 AM PST
by
ohioWfan
(BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
To: OWK
You don't object to ANY of these things in principle... do you? You don't have a problem with Kerry in the White House and you talk to me about principle???
GO KERRY GO!!!
476
posted on
02/12/2004 8:03:03 AM PST
by
Mo1
(" Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?")
To: ohioWfan
If your 'purism' makes you so strongly opposed to Bush, and you don't vote for him, you will be de facto, supporting Kerry.
While we're talking de facto, let me ask you a question: Are the Bush advisors who advocated Amnesty, CFR, big spending, etc., all of which may end up costing more votes than they gain in November, "de facto, supporting Kerry?" Are the Bush stalwarts in this forum who've resisted criticizing this President the past few years, and, to the extent that FR has influence, encouraged the notion that the White House can take votes for granted and squander them, "de facto, supporting Kerry?" If the consequences of an action benefit Kerry's electoral prospects, is the person behind it "de facto, supporting Kerry?"
|
477
posted on
02/12/2004 8:03:10 AM PST
by
Sabertooth
(Sharpen your Long Knives lately?)
To: OWK
Wow, I see some of the "compassionate conservatives" are here. Really pleasant folks out winning converts to their side.
478
posted on
02/12/2004 8:03:47 AM PST
by
MileHi
To: ohioWfan
What amazes me most about these purists, is that, if they were on this forum back in 97 or 98, they HAD to be opposed to xlinton They have short attention spans I guess
479
posted on
02/12/2004 8:04:16 AM PST
by
Mo1
(" Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?")
To: OWK
Since you're still around, will you answer my question about the military?
And while your at it, can you tell me what your write in candidate for the Presidency has said he will do to keep the military strong?
480
posted on
02/12/2004 8:04:23 AM PST
by
ohioWfan
(BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460, 461-480, 481-500 ... 821-831 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson