Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Modernman

Again, this is not the result of some natural, genetic desire to associate solely with one's own race. Rather, it is a result of liberal approaches to education and race that encourage the balkanization of college campuses.

I think I know what you mean. You are talking about all the minority "pride" organizations. But I think the liberals are pandering to an innate tendencies in this case.

There are other examples. Inner city gangs tend to associate by race -- in Los Angeles, there are Hispanic, African-American and Asian gangs, and it isn't because the mayor encourages it.

Sub-Saharan Africa is 99% black, not because few white people have happened to wander there and were not comfortable in the African climate but rather because they have not been successful in competing with the native population. Events in Zimbabwe and South Africa are a good illustration.

199 posted on 02/10/2004 8:23:36 AM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: Dan Evans
Sub-Saharan Africa is 99% black, not because few white people have happened to wander there

Sub-saharan Africa is 99% black/Negroid BECAUSE NO white/Caucasians managed to cross the dividing Sahara desert in any great numbers. When they did, they formed Arabic desert states. Ditto in the East, white/Caucasians from Central Asia/India/Persia moved into China -- the Tocharian culture but never managed to get past the Gobi desert or Siberia.
238 posted on 02/11/2004 1:09:31 AM PST by Cronos (W2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson