Skip to comments.
Update - The rock abrasion tool on Spirit drilled the first human-made hole in a rock on Mars . . .
NASA - JPL ^
| 02-07-2004
| NASA/JPL
Posted on 02/07/2004 3:34:33 PM PST by Phil V.
SPIRIT UPDATE: The rock abrasion tool on Spirit drilled the first human-made hole in a rock on Mars
EVER! - sol 34, Feb 06, 2004
"The RAT performed beyond our expectations," beamed Steve Gorevan, of Honeybee Robotics, New York, lead scientist for the rock abrasion tools on both rovers. "With the docile cutting parameters we set, I didn't think that it would cut this deep. In fact, when we saw virtually a complete circle, I was thrilled beyond anything I could have ever dreamed. Following up that glorious circular brushing - it's like back-to-back homers."
This image, taken by Spirit's panoramic camera shows the circular, 2.65millimeter hole that will be further examined by the microscopic imager in the coming sols.
Although Gorevan and his team took a few moments to celebrate, they have already begun thinking about making more holes. The rock outcrop that Opportunity is heading toward has had the RAT team salivating since it was first revealed. With the first successful drilling under their belts, they are anxious to sink their teeth in again.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: mars; rat; robot; spirit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: lonevoice
Because it's a mono CCD camera, with various filters that can be used in front of it. If you just want to have a look-see mono is faster to shoot and takes less bandwidth to transmit to earth. I presume the science guys would rather have more B&W pictures than 3 times fewer colour ones (A colour pic requires you to take 3 separate exposures). Besides we know the colour - it's red :-)
That said, I hope Opportunity takes some colour photos of that rock outcrop.
There is no such thing as a colour CCD sensor. They are all basically just electronic photon counters, even the "colour" ones in eg. consumer digital cameras actually have an RGB colour filter matrix laid over the top of the pixels.
21
posted on
02/07/2004 4:05:52 PM PST
by
alnitak
("That kid's about as sharp as a pound of wet liver" - Foghorn Leghorn)
To: Phil V.
mars as a gigantic rock tumbler?
To: lonevoice
I've seen a lot of posts bemoaning the fact that NASA's pictures aren't in color, but I haven't seen an explanation for why they're not. Anyone? . . . here's one . . .
The color is produced from the raw pics taken through different filters. This process apparently yields more scientific information.
23
posted on
02/07/2004 4:10:52 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: prion
Wow! Those spheres are microscopic images? They look like electron microscopy. . . . The area is approx 1.2" sq.
24
posted on
02/07/2004 4:12:27 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: Phil V.
25
posted on
02/07/2004 4:14:21 PM PST
by
Spiff
(Have you committed a random act of thoughtcrime today?)
To: Dog
that's a good one - Martian magic shrooms...
26
posted on
02/07/2004 4:17:28 PM PST
by
FRgal4u
To: Phil V.
Friendly MeltTM! Just used my last bag today and my driveway is still a bobsled run.
To: Phil V.
Yep, definitely looks like an artifact of intelligent life on mars!!!
28
posted on
02/07/2004 4:21:17 PM PST
by
ancient_geezer
(Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath a guillotine.)
To: Phil V.
The area is approx 1.2" sq. That's unusual depth of field for that scale.
29
posted on
02/07/2004 4:22:20 PM PST
by
prion
To: Phil V.; All
They'll be an excellent, high-cost replacement for the gravel in fish-tanks! This is bigger than TANG®!
30
posted on
02/07/2004 4:22:24 PM PST
by
johnny7
(“C'mon! You sons 'o bitches wanna live forever!?”)
To: Spiff
Git that crap outa here . . . this is a series discussion!
31
posted on
02/07/2004 4:24:39 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: Phil V.
Those little spheres... is there any process other than surface tension that causes sphericity? I can't think of any off the top of my head. Therefore, it's either evidence of former liquid water, or something like tektites.
To: ancient_geezer
Young Bocci Balls?
33
posted on
02/07/2004 4:28:55 PM PST
by
tubebender
(Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see...)
To: Phil V.
34
posted on
02/07/2004 4:29:47 PM PST
by
Spiff
(Have you committed a random act of thoughtcrime today?)
To: Phil V.
Compare this to the spheres in Costa Rica, those were never explained.
35
posted on
02/07/2004 4:30:21 PM PST
by
Chris Talk
(What Earth now is, Mars once was. What Mars now is, Earth will one day be.)
To: tubebender
baby bowling balls! I should know, I grow em in my backyard.
36
posted on
02/07/2004 4:31:38 PM PST
by
ancient_geezer
(Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath a guillotine.)
To: VadeRetro
Dig out your antique stereoscope and take a gander. Friendly Melt
TM probably won't help much here. Perhaps Noxema?
37
posted on
02/07/2004 4:37:10 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: Phil V.
Looks like somebody dropped a glazed pastry in a mud puddle.
To: Phil V.
Domino's Dots?
39
posted on
02/07/2004 4:41:31 PM PST
by
Marie
(My coffee cup is waaaaay too small to deal with this day.)
To: Phil V.
The rock abrasion tool on Spirit drilled the first human-made hole in a rock on Mars
Actually it was Beagle 2 that made the first human-made hole in a rock on Mars.
40
posted on
02/07/2004 4:41:51 PM PST
by
Arkinsaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson