[Antoninus]

Umm. Pedophilia is still in the DSM, and was just kept there by a large majority. Me thinks you're obfuscating by bringing up something ugly like pedophilia. What reason is there to bring it up otherwise?

They've just started talking approvingly about pedophilia in the "scholarly" journals within the past few years. By the time DSM-VI comes out, what do you want to bet that "large majority" is substantially reduced.

You can call homosexuality a fetish, if you want. The scientific evidence doesn't support that, but it's your choice.

You're right. It's more like an addiction than a fetish.

[breakem]

Talking approvingly about pedophilia in the scholarly journal. I know that one guy wrote a paper saying kids were'nt always hurt by sex, but I can't remember any others. Oh by the way, he has evaporated into the academiosphere. I look forward to reading the rest of the examples when you post them. I'm out.