Skip to comments.
MARS OUTCROP SOURCE OF TINY SPHERES
JPL ^
| sol 13, opportunity, mars
| JPL
Posted on 02/07/2004 7:56:00 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mars; opportunity; spirit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-271 next last
To: Fitzcarraldo
I can't wait to get up there with my pan and shovel!
To: quantim
Am I the only one who notices a pattern here ?
:)
22
posted on
02/07/2004 8:22:00 AM PST
by
ChadGore
(Viva Bush)
To: quantim
LOL.....EXCELLENT!
To: John H K
...Robert Dunham6 and Carroll Thomas,7... Man, these are some smart kids!!!
To: Fitzcarraldo
25
posted on
02/07/2004 8:24:19 AM PST
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: Erik Latranyi
A Martian that lost his marbles? We don't lose things, we just misplace them!!!
26
posted on
02/07/2004 8:26:51 AM PST
by
COBOL2Java
(If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you are reading this in English, thank a soldier.)
To: Alas Babylon!
footnote superscripts that didn't paste, of course :-)
27
posted on
02/07/2004 8:27:13 AM PST
by
John H K
To: Fitzcarraldo
IIRC there are frequent dust storms on Mars. Could it be that particles rolled along the ground by a strong wind eventually wore down into a spherical shape?
Geodes are naturally occurring crystal formations within certain types of rock (on earth). They're not alive, and never were, but their shape is often spherical.
28
posted on
02/07/2004 8:31:49 AM PST
by
ZOOKER
To: Fitzcarraldo
Fossilized diatoms?
29
posted on
02/07/2004 8:33:27 AM PST
by
blam
To: ZOOKER
Spheres are a VERY rare thing to occur naturally in minerals. Crystal habits don't lend themselves to forming spheres. Nature has a few, but they aren't common here on Earth.
30
posted on
02/07/2004 8:37:14 AM PST
by
doodad
To: blam
Diatoms are VERY small. Many orders of magnitude smaller than these.
31
posted on
02/07/2004 8:38:10 AM PST
by
John H K
To: Frank_Discussion
Is there some frickin' reason we can't get a color pic of this from NASA?With the time difference between Mars and Earth, it's apparently about 1940 up there.
Uncle Miltie and Imogene Coco are going to do USO shows for the rovers.
32
posted on
02/07/2004 8:41:47 AM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: dead
Hey, it could happen!
33
posted on
02/07/2004 8:44:10 AM PST
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: John H K
Hey good morning. Isn't this incredible? I am leaning very hard now on water and a concretionary source for this to occur. I can't think of any metamorphic state that would yield spheres unless it was a weird type of retrograde metamorphism affecting certain phenocrysts.
34
posted on
02/07/2004 8:44:28 AM PST
by
doodad
To: Fitzcarraldo
I wonder if they could some how scoop one of these spheres up with the arm, crack it open on top of a rock again using the arm and then do analysis and micro-imagery?
To: doodad
Yep, seems water had to have been involved.
So what do you think of the closeups of the outcrop rocks? That's some REALLY fine foliation.
Now that the pics are closer they look like they MIGHT be "crumbly"...I'm curious if they're really hard or if they'll crumble when the arm is put on them.
36
posted on
02/07/2004 8:50:35 AM PST
by
John H K
To: John H K
Obviously they are weathering differentially as the spheres are being left as the matrix breaks down. I also noticed that the spheres are in most cases larger than the layer they occupy, which would also indicate that they "grew." The only other thing I can think of would be infilling of gas bubbles by a solution. However, they mentioned that large amounts of olivine was present which does not exist with quartz, so they are not siliceous unless a long time gap occured and a change in source materials provided the silica.
37
posted on
02/07/2004 8:56:13 AM PST
by
doodad
To: doodad
I just noticed also that the spheres appear to have formed on the top of the layers. I don't see any that are wrapped or crossed by the layering.
38
posted on
02/07/2004 8:59:14 AM PST
by
doodad
To: doodad
You took the words right out of my mouth!
39
posted on
02/07/2004 9:04:37 AM PST
by
JohnG45
To: John H K
"Diatoms are VERY small. Many orders of magnitude smaller than these." Okay, thanks. (Next headline: Giant Diatom Fossils Found On Mars, lol)
40
posted on
02/07/2004 9:05:47 AM PST
by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-271 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson