Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Dissatisfied by Bush's Iraq Intelligence Commission
TBO.com ^ | 2/07/04 | Ken Guggenheim

Posted on 02/06/2004 11:56:00 PM PST by kattracks

WASHINGTON (AP) - Democrats say President Bush's appointment of a bipartisan commission to examine intelligence on Iraq's weapons falls short of their demands for an independent probe of why prewar claims about Saddam Hussein's weapons programs now appear to have been wrong. Although a former Democratic senator and governor, Charles Robb of Virginia, will serve as the panel's co-chairman, Democrats say the panel cannot be truly independent if all nine members were selected by Republican Bush.

"We had an opportunity to have a truly independent commission that could have brought fresh eyes to the subject. Instead, we have a commission wholly owned by the executive branch investigating the executive branch," House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said.

Bush signed an executive order Friday creating the commission to examine why weapons inspectors have found no chemical and biological weapons stockpiles that U.S. intelligence believed Iraq had before last year's war or evidence of an aggressive nuclear weapons program.

Their existence was the administration's main argument for war.

"Some prewar intelligence assessments by America and other nations about Iraq's weapon stockpiles have not been confirmed," Bush told reporters. "We are determined to figure out why."

The commission also will review U.S. intelligence on weapons programs in countries such as North Korea and Iran, he said. In addition, the panel was told to review spy work on Libya before leader Moammar Gadhafi committed that nation to rid itself of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and on Afghanistan before U.S. troops drove its Taliban rulers from power.

Co-chairing the panel with Robb will be retired judge federal appeals Laurence Silberman, a Republican. Robb, son-in-law of the late President Lyndon Johnson, has been practicing law since leaving the Senate in 2001. Silberman, who served as deputy attorney general in the Nixon and Ford administrations, was named to the appeals court by President Reagan in 1985.

Bush also named to the panel: Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.; Lloyd Cutler, former White House counsel to Presidents Carter and Clinton; former federal judge Patricia M. Wald; Yale University president Richard C. Levin; and retired Adm. William O. Studeman, former deputy director of the CIA.

Wald, a former chief judge for the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, served as a judge on the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Bush intends to name two more members.

The president had initially rejected demands for a commission on prewar intelligence, but pressure built after the former CIA adviser for the weapons search in Iraq, David Kay, said prewar intelligence was wrong. Seeking to defuse what could become a major campaign issue, Bush created the panel and gave it until March 31, 2005, to issue a report - well after the November presidential election.

Democratic criticism continued. Retired Gen. Wesley Clark, a presidential candidate, said Bush was using the panel to affix blame to the intelligence community instead of the policy-makers, including the president, who used the information to make decisions.

Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan, top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, said, "On the one hand, the commission is charged with looking at prewar intelligence assessments on Iraq but apparently not at exaggerations of that intelligence by the Bush administration.

"On the other hand, the commission is tasked to look at so many other areas that it will not be able to adequately focus on the paramount issue of the analysis, production and use of prewar intelligence on Iraq. "

Another Democratic senator, Evan Bayh of Indiana, said the panel "seems to me to be a very credible group of people, ... and that bodes well for the inquiry" if they have timely access to the information they need.

Republican lawmakers backed Bush. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Porter Goss, R-Fla., said it is "totally appropriate" to make the commission's scope more than just Iraq.

"Once you get into how well our intelligence community works and how we deal with weapons of mass destruction and analyzing how our collectors collect and our analysts analyze, I think you are going to find there are systemic problems in our intelligence," he said.

Sen. John Warner, R-Va., chairman of the Armed Services Committee, praised the selections of Robb and McCain. "Both have rendered distinguished service in our military, both have shown independence of thought on serious issues and both are experienced in the arena of national security," he said.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: anklebiters; chuckrobb; prewarintelligence; wmdinvestigation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 02/06/2004 11:56:00 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Of course they are.
2 posted on 02/06/2004 11:56:33 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Pubbies probably aren't either cause their favorite Arab American George Mitchell (family from Lebanon) isn't heading it.
3 posted on 02/07/2004 12:00:27 AM PST by dts32041 (Will Kerry ever call his wife an African American?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
And .. we should care about their disappointment because .......???

Well .. THE DEMOCRATS ARE A DISAPPOINTMENT TO ME!!
4 posted on 02/07/2004 12:01:18 AM PST by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
In the coarse nature of politics and the coarse nature of people in politics it is the task of both sides to start arguments with with the other side under any pretext.
5 posted on 02/07/2004 12:12:34 AM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
If McCain doesn't allow the commission to be used in a partisan manner against President bush, will he change from a media darling to a media goat?
6 posted on 02/07/2004 12:26:51 AM PST by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
You never win
by giving in.

Learn that W,

your father did not.

7 posted on 02/07/2004 12:31:51 AM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Yes a truly independent enquiry should consist of Saddam as chairman ..sorry chairperson, with an assorted array of democrats, anti-war psychopaths and representatives from other terrorist organisations. The enquiry should be conducted in French and in order to diversify it should consist of at least one homosexual, a lesbian, a paedophile, an abortionist and a man who has a fetish for livestock! - They should consult Hans Blix and report back to the UN.
8 posted on 02/07/2004 12:33:39 AM PST by Free_at_last_-2001 (is clinton in jail yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
What a surprise. The Democrats wouldn't be satisfied if Bush announced that he'd deliberately lied about everything in order to start an evil war with poor innocent Saddam, and he felt so guilty about it, he would now commit suicide with a fish knife. They'd complain that the knife wasn't rusty enough. Ska-roo them.
9 posted on 02/07/2004 12:42:25 AM PST by HHFi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HHFi
Ska-roo them.

You said all that had to be said right there, FRiend.

10 posted on 02/07/2004 12:46:19 AM PST by clee1 (Where's the beef???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The Democrats realize that the truth is that any intelligence failures will lead straight back to the Clinton administration.

I figure that Bush met with Tenet before he gave his speech at Georgetown and Tenet assured him that he would lead any investigative commission to the truth about the Clinton administration's foreign policy failures. So Bush said go for it. Now the Democrats are running scared. Boo hoo. Someone should have told them to be careful what you ask for, President Bush is not Orrin Hatch.
11 posted on 02/07/2004 12:50:05 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HHFi
"Ska-roo them"

You are correct, sir! When is W going to learn that there is nothing that will please the Dems??? When they lost the election, they vowed to block him at every turn and MAKE HIS LIFE MISERABLE!! When he realizes that by catering to them, he is losing their respect as well as ours!! I wish he would just tell them that their PMS is harming this country and to SHUT THE HELL UP!!
12 posted on 02/07/2004 12:56:36 AM PST by whadizit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
They Democrats want this investigation in order to provide a spring board from which they intend to bounce off more lies. Even their new hero David Kay said that there was no manipulation of intelligence. It doesn't matter to the Democrats that there is no evidence to support their wacky claims - facts seldom play a part in their rants. Their intent is clear. They hope to convince as many people as possible that the President lied, manipulated, strong armed, and intimidated intelligence gatherers. They're disgusting.
13 posted on 02/07/2004 1:19:04 AM PST by Jaysun (There is no rejection in life quite like a canceled shrink appointment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Democratic senator, Evan Bayh of Indiana, said the panel "seems to me to be a very credible group of people,………… Sen. John Warner, R-Va., chairman of the Armed Services Committee, praised the selections of Robb and McCain.

Chuck Robb, co-chair.

LBJ's son in law. Had parties with coke whores while govenor at Va Beach on the weekends.

Got "massages" whiled naked from former Miss Virginia.

Clinton loving left wing voting senator, defeated finally in 2000.

14 posted on 02/07/2004 2:13:10 AM PST by xyz123 (Mama always said "A RINO is as a RINO does.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Lloyd Cutler! This guy is sooo covered with Carter's crap its disgusting. He's deep into the overthrow of the Shah of Iran, buddies with Ramsey Clark and Ralph Nader. Lloyd Cutler social network
15 posted on 02/07/2004 3:36:25 AM PST by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
If Bush came up with a cure for cancer the Demorats would complain about the loss of jobs to lab rats.
16 posted on 02/07/2004 3:54:37 AM PST by CIBGUY (CIBGUY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CIBGUY
Thats absolutely true. In a comment by a poster in moveon.org, Rush said it was said, "I don't care if Bush found a cure for cancer. I would still hate him." Their hatred knows no bounds. Sick!!
17 posted on 02/07/2004 3:58:19 AM PST by beckysueb (Lady Liberty is in danger! Bush/Cheney 04.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CIBGUY
Professional courtesy.
18 posted on 02/07/2004 4:29:43 AM PST by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Co-chairing the panel with Robb will be retired judge federal appeals Laurence Silberman, a Republican. Robb, son-in-law of the late President Lyndon Johnson, has been practicing law since leaving the Senate in 2001. Silberman, who served as deputy attorney general in the Nixon and Ford administrations, was named to the appeals court by President Reagan in 1985.

Bush also named to the panel: Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.; Lloyd Cutler, former White House counsel to Presidents Carter and Clinton; former federal judge Patricia M. Wald; Yale University president Richard C. Levin; and retired Adm. William O. Studeman, former deputy director of the CIA.

I never get picked to be on the team.

19 posted on 02/07/2004 4:30:35 AM PST by BigWaveBetty (Won't you please, won't you please, please won't you be my neighbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I'm pretty dissatisfied with Democrats' intelligence.
20 posted on 02/07/2004 4:36:10 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson