Replies

In reference to 1915:

I believe a very basic weapon would still be viable, even if it is over 15 years old. A weapon of the size and weight described in the reports of the Soviet SADM's would not be very sophisticated, and probably would work if the conventional explosives were intact and the circuits had not corroded.

It may not detonate high order, or may partially detonate. Either way, there would be fission, and there would be a nuclear explosion. The only difference would be yield.

I can see the panic evident on a few posts, but I am not going to panic. If it happens, I will be very angry, especially since I have dual response commitments to a lot of the East Coast with my job in emergency management.

I find it interesting a lot of press is out there stating Al Qaeda may have nukes, and a lot of things are happening that make me want to ask questions.

I dont recommend panic, however. An informed approach to the problem is the best approach. Trust in God, be prepared, and remain informed. Thats the best approach I know of.