Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexKat; milkncookies; All
Seems like all kinds of new info is flooding the major media these days about alQaeda nukes. There is also a flood other information suddenly coming in to NEIN about the problem of the massive proliferation of rogue nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorists and our ability to keep track of them all.

Here's a real good article on this subject which reiterates many points I have posted in this thread previously.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29109

WAR ON TERROR
Does al-Qaida have
20 suitcase nukes?
Author claims bin Laden purchased them in '98 from ex-KGB agents for $30 million



Posted: October 2, 2002
1:00 a.m. Eastern



© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com


Editor's note: The following story was posted on Oct. 2. For an update, see 'Bush, Blair warned of bin Laden nukes'

A new book by an FBI consultant on international terrorism says Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida terrorist network purchased 20 suitcase nuclear weapons from former KGB agents in 1998 for $30 million.

The book,"Al Qaeda: Brotherhood of Terror," by Paul L. Williams, also says this deal was one of at least three in the last decade in which al-Qaida purchased small nuclear weapons or weapons-grade nuclear uranium.

Williams says bin Laden's search for nuclear weapons began in 1988 when he hired a team of five nuclear scientists from Turkmenistan. These were former employees at the atomic reactor in Iraq before it was destroyed by Israel, Williams says. The team's project was the development of a nuclear reactor that could be used "to transform a very small amount of material that could be placed in a package smaller than a backpack."

"By 1990 bin Laden had hired hundreds of atomic scientists from the former Soviet Union for $2,000 a month – an amount far greater that their wages in the former Soviet republics," Williams writes. "They worked in a highly sophisticated and well-fortified laboratory in Kandahar, Afghanistan."

This work continued throughout the 1990s, the author says.

In 1993, according to the book, Jamal Ahmed al-Fadl, a bin Laden agent who turned into a Central Intelligence Agency source, purchased for al-Qaida a cylinder of weapons-grade uranium from a former Sudanese government minister who represented businessmen from South Africa. The purchase price was $1.5 million and the uranium was tested in Cyprus and transported to Afghanistan.

Al-Fadl reported that, at the time of this transfer, al-Qaida was already working on a deal for suitcase nukes developed for the KGB.

Williams says the Russian Mafia made another mysterious deal with "Afghani Arabs" in search of nuclear weapons in 1996. The Russians who sold the material now live in New York.

Then again in 1998, Mamdouh Mahmud Salim was arrested in Munich and charged with acting as an al-Qaida agent to purchase highly enriched uranium from a German laboratory.

That same year, according to Williams, bin Laden succeeded in buying the 20 suitcase nukes from Chechen Mafia figures, including former KGB agents. The $30 million deal was partly cash and partly heroin with a street value of $700 million.

"After the devices were obtained, they were placed in the hands of Arab nuclear scientists who, federal sources say, 'were probably trained at American universities,'" says Williams.

Though the devices were designed only to be operated by Soviet SPETZNAZ personnel, or special forces, al-Qaida scientists came up with a way of hot-wiring the bombs to the bodies of would-be martyrs, according to the book.

Suitcase nukes are not really suitcases at all, but suitcase-size nuclear devices. The weapons can be fired from grenade or rocket launchers or detonated by timers. A bomb placed in the center of a metropolitan area would be capable of instantly killing hundreds of thousands and exposing millions of others to lethal radiation.

Yossef Bodansky, author of "Bin Laden: The Man Who Declared War on America" and the U.S. Congress' top terrorism expert, concurs that bin Laden has already succeeded in purchasing suitcase nukes. Former Russian security chief Alexander Lebed also testified to Congress that 40 nuclear suitcases disappeared from the Russian arsenal after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Williams quotes an anonymous federal official as saying: "The question isn't whether bin Laden has nuclear weapons, it's when he will try to use them."

In addition to the suitcase nukes, Williams reports that al-Qaida has also obtained chemical weapons from North Korea and Iraq. Williams says the FBI confirmed to him that Saddam Hussein provided bin Laden with a "gift" of anthrax spores.

Williams says al-Qaida also includes in its arsenal plague viruses, including ebola and salmonella, from the former Soviet Union and Iraq, samples of botulism biotoxin from the Czech Republic, and sarin from Iraq and North Korea.





1,658 posted on 02/10/2004 9:33:42 AM PST by Sean Osborne Lomax (http://www.HomelandSecurityUS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1650 | View Replies ]


To: Sean Osborne Lomax
"After the devices were obtained, they were placed in the hands of Arab nuclear scientists who, federal sources say, 'were probably trained at American universities,'" says Williams.


Incredible!!!
1,660 posted on 02/10/2004 9:36:37 AM PST by Mossad1967
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1658 | View Replies ]

To: Sean Osborne Lomax
not to mention several new posts each day on the Arabic boards with not-so-pretty pictures of exploding nuclear weapons :(

One question I hear quite a bit is "If Al Qaeda has nuclear weapons why haven't they used them?"

I suspect the answer is twofold. Perhaps it is partially because of our security - we may have stopped them from using them. And perhaps they just aren't ready to use them yet. Why not? I wish I had that answer. Because if you can answer that question, then you can go a long way to answering the related question: when WILL they use them?
1,662 posted on 02/10/2004 9:41:07 AM PST by StillProud2BeFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1658 | View Replies ]

To: Sean Osborne Lomax; All
Latest EOM message:


Subject: I have do nothing to prove to you Amerikkkan
CC:
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:05:18 +0000 (UTC)


You seek proof. Watch your national news. You will know when my
hand
has appeared. Will be on the east coast. Many square miles
destructed,
yes we have nuclear weapons and we will use them at a specific moment
in time which is arriving. Until then we continue to communicate
under
other names on your yahoo board and freedom watchers. Our message
appear normal enough not unlike any other member, this our purpose to
communicate with each other right under your noses. I owe you no
proof
only total destruction. You make no demands of EOM infidel harlot,
is
not your place.


1,664 posted on 02/10/2004 9:44:35 AM PST by Mossad1967
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1658 | View Replies ]

To: Sean Osborne Lomax
Sean, that was posted yesterday. There seems to be some confusion between suitcase and backpack nukes, which, as I understand, are not the same thing.

In any event, the poster "poohbah", who claims to have some working knowledge on these nuclear devices was pinged to this thread and asked if these devices, in light of their age, would still be functional. His rather succinct answer was "no". He did indicate that they could be converted to "dirty" radioactive explosive devices.

To: Poohbah Is it even plausible that, with the proper information and necessary equipment, let's say from AQ's apparent connections to Pakistan's Khan and/or at least some of the scientist's working for Khan, that they (AQ) "could" maintain the viability of these weapons for an indefinite length of time if they were still operable at the time of purchase? If AQ knowingly bought the weapons in an inoperable state, is it plausible they could be "refurbished", for lack of a better term, with the proper guidance and materials, or would it be more likely they bought them knowing the most they could do with them is construct a "dirty bomb".

To: milkncookies

Is it even plausible that, with the proper information and necessary equipment, let's say from AQ's apparent connections to Pakistan's Khan and/or at least some of the scientist's working for Khan, that they (AQ) "could" maintain the viability of these weapons for an indefinite length of time if they were still operable at the time of purchase?

Nope. Tritium decays, plutonium decays, and Pakistan doesn't have very much of either to hand out to terrorists.

If AQ knowingly bought the weapons in an inoperable state, is it plausible they could be "refurbished", for lack of a better term, with the proper guidance and materials, or would it be more likely they bought them knowing the most they could do with them is construct a "dirty bomb".

The latter.

1,372 posted on 02/09/2004 3:37:27 PM CST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
1,665 posted on 02/10/2004 9:47:02 AM PST by milkncookies (As Napoleon said, "Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1658 | View Replies ]

To: Sean Osborne Lomax
So what is your opinion of that? I've read that osama says he won't use nukes on us till we use them on them or till qaeda is dismantled. What do you think?
1,672 posted on 02/10/2004 9:58:37 AM PST by knak (wasknaknowknid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1658 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson