Skip to comments.
Judge Rules in Favor of Clarett
Bucknuts.com ^
| 2/5/2004
| By Bucknuts.com Staff
Posted on 02/05/2004 10:11:42 AM PST by smith288
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
1
posted on
02/05/2004 10:11:43 AM PST
by
smith288
To: smith288
well so much for rules and reg's that businesses want to use
2
posted on
02/05/2004 10:13:45 AM PST
by
markman46
To: smith288
Scheindlin sided with Clarett because he was fighting a policy that excludes all players in his position from selling their services to the only viable buyer, the NFL. *cough* CFL *cough*
3
posted on
02/05/2004 10:14:46 AM PST
by
smith288
(If terrorist hate George W. Bush, then he has my vote!)
To: smith288
This is going to ruin the NFL.
Just look at the NBA.
4
posted on
02/05/2004 10:16:10 AM PST
by
dyed_in_the_wool
("For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible" - GWB)
To: smith288
I don't agree with the decision, but it has always seemed to me inescapable under Antitrust law, and I don't think the CFL is a viable alternative.
5
posted on
02/05/2004 10:17:56 AM PST
by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: dyed_in_the_wool
The rule is somewhat goofy in that a 15 yr old scholar who graduates early from High School can enter a draft but a 20 yr old soph in college cannot. But this is still very harmful in my opinion.
6
posted on
02/05/2004 10:18:11 AM PST
by
smith288
(If terrorist hate George W. Bush, then he has my vote!)
To: smith288
I just don't understand why the NFL wants this rule. Why don't they let the freedom of competition decide wether someone is able to play in the NFL.
7
posted on
02/05/2004 10:18:35 AM PST
by
Lost Highway
(There's no stoppin the cretins from hoppin.)
To: dyed_in_the_wool
"This is going to ruin the NFL."
What he said fifty times over!
8
posted on
02/05/2004 10:19:25 AM PST
by
writer33
(The U.S. Constitution defines a Conservative)
To: smith288
Scheindlin sided with Clarett because he was fighting a policy that excludes all players in his position from selling their services to the only viable buyer, the NFL. Could the little putz go to the Arena League?
9
posted on
02/05/2004 10:19:50 AM PST
by
JohnnyZ
To: smith288
Oh, I also think Clarett is going to have a very rough time in the NFL. He's just not developed enough.
10
posted on
02/05/2004 10:19:56 AM PST
by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: smith288
Scheindlin sided with Clarett because he was fighting a policy that excludes all players in his position from selling their services to the only viable buyer, the NFL.Here's what I dont get. Why are these laws used to protect a certain set of particular skills? Can't he always go and get an office job, a construction job, something else?
11
posted on
02/05/2004 10:20:43 AM PST
by
Paradox
(Cogito ergo Doom.)
To: smith288
Predictions: (Not wishes)
1. This will have little impact on the NCAA or NFL, as most players will still want to maximize their value in the draft by waiting until after their junior year to go pro.
2. MC will be drafted by a crappy team no higher than the second round, and will be injured before the regular 2004 NFL season starts.
12
posted on
02/05/2004 10:20:49 AM PST
by
PackerBoy
(Just my opinion ....)
To: dyed_in_the_wool
This is going to ruin the NFL. Just look at the NBA. I don't think younger players ruined the NBA. What ruined the NBA was rules implemented that valued individual athletic ability over the knowledge of how to play team basketball.
13
posted on
02/05/2004 10:21:07 AM PST
by
Lost Highway
(There's no stoppin the cretins from hoppin.)
To: smith288
It will be interesting to see which NFL team drafts such an often-injured, multiple lie-teller & high maintainence individual as Clarett.
I don't know how many good running backs are available this year but I bet he doesn't go in the first round. Even without all of the non-football BS, Clarett has been shown to be much too brittle -- and that's just in college ball.
14
posted on
02/05/2004 10:21:14 AM PST
by
gdani
(Have you played Atari today?)
To: Petronski
viable in what term? its a viable option in that you can make a living for doing your job. So he cant live like a king for a year...whoopy.
15
posted on
02/05/2004 10:23:02 AM PST
by
smith288
(If terrorist hate George W. Bush, then he has my vote!)
To: dyed_in_the_wool
This is going to ruin the NFL.Just look at the NBA.
Yeah -- LeBron clearly isn't ready to compete in the NBA.
Nor was Moses Malone, Spencer Haywood, Darryl Dawkins, Kobe Bryant, Tracy McGrady, Kevin Garnett, Jermaine O'Neal, Shawn Kemp, etc, etc
16
posted on
02/05/2004 10:25:40 AM PST
by
gdani
(Have you played Atari today?)
To: Petronski
In trying to maintain the status quo, the NFL argued that Clarett should not be eligible because its rule resulted from a collective bargaining agreement with the players. Hence, the rule is immune from antitrust scrutiny, because Clarett cannot bring such a lawsuit and because its rule is reasonable. Clarett was not a party to nor were interests represented in the collective bargaining agreement. That this was the best argument the NFL could present indicates the weakness of its case. Whether this decision is best for the NFL or college footbal is not the point; Clarett's rights are.
17
posted on
02/05/2004 10:27:19 AM PST
by
connectthedots
(Recognize that not all Calvinists will be Christians in glory.)
To: gdani
Don't forget Carmello Anthony. If I am not mistaken he would have been inelligble under the NFL rules.
18
posted on
02/05/2004 10:29:05 AM PST
by
Lost Highway
(There's no stoppin the cretins from hoppin.)
To: smith288
The worst part? Once again an athlete gets rewarded for bad behavior. And we wonder why morals and standards are falling in this country.
19
posted on
02/05/2004 10:30:20 AM PST
by
rikkir
(The Pats have the trophy, but it's got claw marks all over it !!)
To: All
20
posted on
02/05/2004 10:31:56 AM PST
by
LisaMalia
(Buckeye Fan since birth!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson