To: chance33_98
If it comes down to a Constitutional ammendment that marriage should be between a man and a woman, it better have a clause in it that it refers to a genetic man and woman.
Otherwise the lawyers are gonna have a field day defining "Man" and "Woman."
Also the crowd that thinks you can walk into a garden and take an axe to a prickly pear(pair?) and make it a rose bush will have to be taken into account.
62 posted on
02/05/2004 12:10:16 PM PST by
N. Theknow
(John Kerry is nothing more than Ted Kennedy without a dead girl in the car.)
To: N. Theknow
Good point...LOL.
To: N. Theknow
If it comes down to a Constitutional ammendment that marriage should be between a man and a woman, it better have a clause in it that it refers to a genetic man and woman.
Actually, if you realized how many different ways a person's gender can be messed up during their time in the womb, you would realize that genetics is not the single detremining factor in gender. Hormones play a major role also.
Otherwise the lawyers are gonna have a field day defining "Man" and "Woman."
I have been trying to state this for a while now.
68 posted on
02/05/2004 12:26:11 PM PST by
Paul C. Jesup
(Voting for a lesser evil is still an evil act and therefore evil...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson