No, a victory for political correctness.
There is no "right" to redefine a word that has for millenia meant one thing.
If the judges are allowed to do this, suit should be immediately filed to really change the definition. There's absolutely no logical grounds to restrict the new "marriage" to "two" "persons".
Multiple partners should be fine, animals should be fine, inanimate objects should be fine, etc.
It's a ludicrous, but politically correct position, for the Mass SC to pander to homosexuals, as they're the cause de jure.
Don't forget the neighbors two year old daughter or son.
If you have no moral compass anything goes.