Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
If the main reason for war had been liberation of Iraqis, I'd have opposed it outright.

That's exactly why they "undersold" the issue.

What makes it even more ridiculous is that "the liberation of Iraq" doesn't even pass the smell test, either. If the U.S. is supposed to be liberating Iraqis from the grips of Saddam's small band of loyalists, and these loyalists are armed with little more than AK-47s, RPGs, and roadside explosives -- then the "liberation of Iraq" could be accomplished simply by handing out an M-16 and several thousand rounds of ammunition to everyone in the country.

135 posted on 02/03/2004 11:06:31 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
Right, meanwhile we've got 100,000 troops there and no end in sight.
145 posted on 02/03/2004 11:19:27 AM PST by Huck (I was gonna write an opus, but we'll just have to wait and see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson