Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Triple Word Score
but the list you've presented should darn well trump the areas of disagreement

Maybe. Maybe not. But as long as Southack is going to spam threads, I guess I can counter-spam.

Source

In his nomination acceptance speech in 2000 Bush said, "Big government is not the answer." It reminded me of when Ronald Reagan said that government is not the solution and then presided over a 67% increase in federal spending during his 8-year tenure. Republicans campaign like libertarians but govern like socialists. They increase government spending, drown business in new regulations, create and expand government programs, impose economic sanctions on other countries and meddle in their internal affairs, instigate wars, and curtail freedom. They're willing to pander to virtually any special interest group which throws money in their direction. They even enact gun-control. Republicans have no incentive to reduce government because they can always count on their rank-and-file supporters to vote party-line. If you want to reduce government and get it out of your life then you must stop supporting the people who are making government bigger. Supporting the "lesser of two evils" isn't going to reduce government.Since taking office George W. Bush has increased the national debt by $895.7 billion. [source]
George W. Bush has spent more time campaigning while in office than any of his predecessors. [source]
Bush has never vetoed a spending bill. [source]
With GOP Congress behind him, Bush has yet to use veto [source]
— Aided by a Republican-controlled Congress, President Bush is on track to become the first chief executive since John Quincy Adams in the 1820s to complete a full term without vetoing one bill.

Do Republicans really support smaller government? Here are some interesting facts:

SOCIALIST WELFARE PROGRAMS & POLITICAL BOONDOGGLES


20 posted on 02/02/2004 2:39:49 PM PST by Sir Gawain (loads of robot monkey fun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Gawain
"Since taking office George W. Bush has increased the national debt by $895.7 billion"

Bush must be king, spending all of that money all by himself...

Grin!

Yes, Bush has allowed Congress to spend too much. I'll grant you that criticism.

Fortunately, that spending has at least purchased us some conservative victories such as increased defense spending (including our national missile defense system deployment this year), homeland security, as well as positioned us to be able (politically) to kill our involvement in the International Criminal Court, the anti-2nd Amendment UN Ban on Small Arms Trafficking Treaty, the Kytoto Global Warming nonsense, etc.

Such over-spending isn't desired, of course, but it's tough to push through conservative proposal after conservative proposal without such overt bribes when Democrats can shut down the Senate with ease.

But if spending is your be all and end all, then you may as well bark at the moon.

On the other hand, if what you "get" from all of that spending matters to you even in the least, then you have to put Bush light years ahead of his closest opposition.

28 posted on 02/02/2004 2:48:37 PM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
So...everything with you boils down to DOLLARS??? Those dollars won't matter squat if a nuclear bomb or highly infectious disease kills multitudes of Americans. Priorities must be considered.
29 posted on 02/02/2004 2:49:31 PM PST by E=MC<sup>2</sup>
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
FOREIGN-AID

Wow! Lots of transfers from poor people in a rich country to rich people in poor countries.
36 posted on 02/02/2004 2:52:32 PM PST by labolarueda (It used to be that 50% of all married people were wives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain; Alan Chapman
I see you you are doing Uber Libertarian Alan Chapman's bidding. This is the guy on FR who basically wanted firemen to get a check first before they put it out.
39 posted on 02/02/2004 2:53:22 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
I just love an underdog. Bring it on. Tell me again how wonderful it will be with a rat in the WH.

W'04
51 posted on 02/02/2004 3:02:16 PM PST by Liberty Valance (In Honor and memory of Pfc Cody Orr, Kerrville Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
You keep posting that garbage from a DISCREDITED source. No one's impressed by it and no one even reads it anymore. Stop spamming that tripe to threads.
53 posted on 02/02/2004 3:03:14 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
Thanks for posting that. I've copied it to my hard drive just in case it gets zotted.
80 posted on 02/02/2004 3:20:35 PM PST by Badray (Make sure that the socialist in the White House has to fight a conservative Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
What does your tagline mean?

20 posted on 02/02/2004 2:39:49 PM PST by Sir Gawain (loads of robot monkey fun)

I'm sure you will have an innocent reply, but to a poster who has been called a Bushbot before..I'm just curious.

81 posted on 02/02/2004 3:21:06 PM PST by Krodg (...when you no-show for a decade, you ain't the base anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
This list must come from a libertarian, because as a CONSERVATIVE, there are a number of things on the list that are not a problem at all. This is a general rant against Republicans in general. It seems to me that if you're just going to accuse George W. Bush of being a Republican...so what? This is a reason not to re-elect him?

You start off attacking Ronald Reagan who is/was without a doubt a conservative.

I'm going to say something you're going to hate. Not all government spending is evil. Yes, government does have to spend money sometimes. Do they spend far more than they should? The conservative position is yes, they do. Do I disagree with the way they get the money (income tax, death tax, etc.)? Yes.

But if your entire argument is "Look, the government spends money under Republicans" than I'm just not outraged. Yes, they spend money on defense (and yes, that includes the Coast Guard), "anti-terror" programs, the US Geological Survey Center, and other things. What's wrong with any of that? What is it with libertarians that they don't understand things like defense?

And social conservatives see little wrong with conserving society via "faith-based initiatives", the war on drugs, and the like. Some may disagree with them ideologically, but they are conservatives.

Quite frankly, the more I look at this list the more I wonder if you actually read it. Railing against teaching English in schools, the Amber Alert system, the war in Iraq, the war in Afghanistan, etc.? What's the point of this?

Not to mention that it is Congress that creates and maintains a lot of these expenditures.


88 posted on 02/02/2004 3:27:58 PM PST by DameAutour (It's not Bush, it's the Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
Why don't you go through each line item and tell us who proposed the item and if it was buried in another law that was needed. The pork barrel expenditures plus having to revamp everything including our defense department (thanks to BC spending all his time with his liasons), AS WELL AS 911, have led to this deficit. Do you know any elderly people who cannot afford to buy medicine after they go to the doctor? I would much rather pay for medication for our
seniors and disabled than the frivolous pork barrel deals to buy votes. Do you know a better way to handle the illegal immigrants? Please, don't tell me any of demos running around bashing Bush have the answer to these problems.
112 posted on 02/02/2004 4:28:57 PM PST by PROUDAMREP (UNITE FOR BUSH IN '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
bump for later (thanks!)
117 posted on 02/02/2004 4:54:22 PM PST by PistolPaknMama (pro gun Mother's Day 2004! www.2asisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
Um, what's your source for that?...
192 posted on 02/07/2004 8:22:33 AM PST by Godfollow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
So, who you voting for, France?
193 posted on 02/07/2004 8:23:56 AM PST by Godfollow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson