To: camle
well if MTV isn't gonna produce any more half time shows, then next year we might actually see something with a little class? Yea......like Lawrence Welk maybe??!!
I guess I am the only one that really liked it. I thought it was the best half time show in a long time.
As for Justin pulling off part of Janet's top.......well, I didn't see any nip. I thought it was part of the show.
Oh well. Can't please everyone.
But I really enjoyed it and didn't think it lasted LONG enough.
![](http://www.hostfile.com/home/darlene/name.jpg)
If anyone was offended by this, don't EVER watch Wild On! Goodness!
47 posted on
02/02/2004 6:09:13 AM PST by
SheLion
(Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
To: SheLion
Yes, the choice is either Janet/Justin or Lawrence Welk.
There's no such thing as a fun, wholesome pop entertainment that people of all ages can enjoy.
Just Janet or Lawrence...
/sarcasm
To: SheLion
"As for Justin pulling off part of Janet's top.......well, I didn't see any nip. I thought it was part of the show."
That's right...it was part of the show, and if you want to see someone topless, then go to the local stip bar..NOT a family event.
sw
54 posted on
02/02/2004 6:17:03 AM PST by
spectre
(Spectre's Wife (PS. What did we expect from a Jackson?)
To: SheLion
I guess I am the only one that really liked it. I thought it was the best half time show in a long time. As for Justin pulling off part of Janet's top.......well, I didn't see any nip. I thought it was part of the show. Oh well. Can't please everyone.
But I really enjoyed it and didn't think it lasted LONG enough.
If you ever have children, don't complain when some 14 year old boy rips your daughters shirt off in public. After all, he saw Timberflake do it.
And you certainly shouldn't take offense if it's your son who does it because as you mention, you can't please everyone.
Are you sure there wasn't supposed to be a wink thing in your post?
60 posted on
02/02/2004 6:19:27 AM PST by
Mike K
To: SheLion
If anyone was offended by this, don't EVER watch Wild On! Goodness! I never heard of Wild On --- and wasn't going to watch it or let my kids watch it --- it's one thing for people to turn on their cable tv's to intentionally watch strip shows or whatever gets their attention --- but some of us want our kids watching wholesome shows --- and we thought the Superbowl might be one.
88 posted on
02/02/2004 6:37:53 AM PST by
FITZ
To: SheLion
>>...But I really enjoyed it and didn't think it lasted LONG enough...<<
I think they should do away with the halftime shows altogether.
They're too long, they're not very well produced and they try to cram too much into the shows. Plus all the fireworks create tons of smoke that hangs around and ruins the view of the game.
94 posted on
02/02/2004 6:42:18 AM PST by
FReepaholic
(Never Forget: www.september-11-videos.com)
To: SheLion
If anyone was offended by this, don't EVER watch Wild On! Goodness! That is precisely everyone's point!If you want to watch someone have their top ripped off knowingly that is you prerogative,but when you are not even given the choice,that is infringing on the rights of those who do not want to lower their standards to that level.
106 posted on
02/02/2004 6:51:45 AM PST by
tapatio
To: SheLion
"If anyone was offended by this, don't EVER watch Wild On! Goodness!"
I was offended. There were little kids watching. If See BS is going to broadcast some 40-something broad's mammary into my living room, I want a parental discretion warning.
Home Box Office is one thing. Network TV is a whole different kettle of fish.
To: SheLion
Yeah it was just a fantastic show for my kids to watch. Since when do I have to monitor what is shown during the Super Bowl Half-Time "show"?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson