Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic Chief Says 'AWOL' Bush Will Be an Issue After a Nominee Emerges
New York Times ^ | 02/02/04 | KATHARINE Q. SEELYE

Posted on 02/01/2004 9:29:20 PM PST by KQQL

OSEVILLE, Mich., Feb. 1 — With the Democratic presidential candidates campaigning across the country on Sunday, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee accused President Bush of being AWOL during his Air National Guard service, a signal of the ferocious campaign ahead once the Democrats finish with one another.

Revisiting an issue that arose briefly at the end of the last presidential election, the chairman, Terry McAuliffe, said he expected Mr. Bush's record of military service in the 1970's to become an issue this fall, particularly if the Democrats nominate the front-runner, Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts.

Mr. McAuliffe said he was staying neutral in the fight for his party's nomination. But, he said, if Mr. Kerry is the nominee, Mr. McAuliffe will relish comparing him with Mr. Bush.

"I look forward to that debate, when John Kerry, a war hero with a chest full of medals, is standing next to George Bush, a man who was AWOL" in the National Guard, Mr. McAuliffe said on the ABC program "This Week."

"George Bush never served in our military in our country," he said. "He didn't show up when he should have showed up."

Ed Gillespie, chairman of the Republican National Committee, called the comments "slanderous."

"President Bush served honorably in the National Guard," Mr. Gillespie said in a telephone interview. "He was never AWOL. To make an accusation like that on national television with no basis in fact is despicable."

The issue of Mr. Bush's military service arose when the filmmaker Michael Moore, a supporter of Gen. Wesley K. Clark, called Mr. Bush a deserter at a rally last month.

Mr. McAuliffe's attack on Mr. Bush seemed partly pre-emptive, suggesting that the Democrats would swing back hard if the Republicans tried to portray Mr. Kerry, decorated for his service in Vietnam, as weak on national security because in his Senate career he has voted against increasing the Pentagon budget.

It might also have been a diversionary tactic by Mr. McAuliffe, who has watched with dismay as the Democratic candidates deliver increasingly harsh blows at one another. If that was the case, it failed.

Howard Dean continued to blast Mr. Kerry on Sunday, saying Mr. Kerry had taken more money from lobbyists than any other senator in the last 15 years. Citing an article in Time magazine that said Mr. Kerry once corresponded with Johnny Chung, who later pleaded guilty to illegally funneling money to the Kerry campaign, Dr. Dean said Mr. Kerry owed voters an apology.

"He misrepresented himself, grossly misrepresented himself, as a candidate who would take on special interests in Washington," Dr. Dean told reporters on his campaign plane. "We cannot go on in this country having United States senators and public officials gather their money from people who they then perform favors for."

Mr. Kerry told reporters that the Chung story was old news. "The moment we had learned anything about that contribution," he said, "we returned the entire contribution."

On Saturday Mr. Kerry fired back, saying that Dr. Dean had conflicts of his own and had had to seal his records from his days as governor of Vermont to hide them. He also said that two of Dr. Dean's top campaign aides had been corporate lobbyists.

But Mr. Kerry generally held his fire on Sunday, staying in Fargo, N.D., and taking the posture of a front-runner as he anticipated a strong showing in Tuesday's string of primaries and caucuses. He also spurned the idea of a one-on-one debate with Dr. Dean, which he proposed before he won in Iowa and in New Hampshire.

"We're in a seven-state primary," Mr. Kerry said. "I don't have time right now."

Dr. Dean, who has said he does not expect to win in any of the seven states that hold contests on Tuesday, said he would drop out of the race if someone else accumulated enough delegates to claim the nomination. But he also told reporters that he did not expect anyone to do that before the convention.

He said on the NBC program "Meet the Press" that he intended to stay in the race through March 2, "Super Tuesday," when delegate-rich states like California and New York vote.

Mr. Kerry appeared to be running out the clock. Instead of charging off on Sunday to a populous state with more delegates than North Dakota, he stayed in Fargo to watch the Super Bowl.

Speaking to a crowd of about 600 North Dakotans at the Fargo Air Museum at midday Sunday, Mr. Kerry repeated his standard stump speech. He did not back off from his sharp criticisms of the Bush administration as being hostage to special interests, even in the face of continued sharp attacks from Dr. Dean.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama; US: Massachusetts; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2004; deserter; dnc; politicalfeint
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: dighton
Doesn't McAuliffe leave after a nominee is chosen, or is he a**hole for life ?
21 posted on 02/01/2004 9:52:16 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Wasn't all this known in the 2000 election? Hasn't the Bush admin been successful so far in the war on terror? I don't see why it is assummed veterans will flock to Kerry just because of his war record. I know a few, and they will be voting for Bush.
22 posted on 02/01/2004 9:52:38 PM PST by Welsh Rabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Cheire will keep Mccliff........
23 posted on 02/01/2004 9:53:02 PM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Should have "showed" up??? I guess the Democrats don't have much room to criticize Bush on use of the English language.
24 posted on 02/01/2004 9:53:41 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Mr. McAuliffe's attack on Mr. Bush seemed partly pre-emptive, suggesting that the Democrats would swing back hard if the Republicans tried to portray Mr. Kerry, decorated for his service in Vietnam, as weak on national security because in his Senate career he has voted against increasing the Pentagon budget.

As I wrote in another thread on McAuliffe's "war hero Kerry" Vs Bush:

I'm old enough to know Kerry and his anti-war activities personally, I was at the Vietnam Veterans against the War rally on the Washington Monument grounds and heard him speak. (I worked for the company that ran the concession stands on D.C. area national park properties)

This SOB -- though less at that rally than in his testimony to congress and other speeches -- did not just speak against the policy makers and the people that sent these guys to war, he attacked the troops. He is directly responsible for the troops getting spat on when they came home.

IMO - Kerry is long over due for an attack on his real "war record", not just the medals. No better time than NOW!

here's a NewsMax article on him --


http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/1/20/131219.shtml
25 posted on 02/01/2004 9:57:26 PM PST by Jackson Brown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Another thread from Newsmax with a 160 or so comments if anyone is interesting in reading it.......

McAuliffe: Dems Will Focus on Bush AWOL Charge ^

26 posted on 02/01/2004 9:57:49 PM PST by deport (BUSH - CHENEY 2004.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
They also seem to have forgotten that 9/11 ever happened. The 2002 Congressional elections showed who Americans trust for national defense. So Kerry fought bravely 30 years ago... That doesn't change the fact he would still be waiting for permission from the UN right now to go into Afghanistan if he were the CIC.
27 posted on 02/01/2004 9:59:31 PM PST by Welsh Rabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BenR2
As a military retiree who has done reserve time, Bush's military history sounds "sketchy," at best.

Well there's nothing "sketchy" about Kerry's betraying Vietnam vets and pretending to throw away his metals in protest and being associated with Jane Fonda in the antiwar movement.

Nothing in Bush's record comes close to Kerry's disgraceful history.

And now we have Kerry ripping the great accomplishments of our military men and women in Iraq by saying the war was wrong.

The idea that the double-talking two-faced John Kerry has a record to challenge Bush as commander in chief is just laughable. The opposite is true.

28 posted on 02/01/2004 9:59:34 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
The idea that the double-talking two-faced John Kerry has a record to challenge Bush as commander in chief is just laughable. The opposite is true.

////////
Hello? Did you read my post? I think you and I are in total agreement here.
29 posted on 02/01/2004 10:01:32 PM PST by BenR2 ((John 3:16: Still True Today.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: deport
thanks
30 posted on 02/01/2004 10:01:38 PM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
McAwful is really reaching for the bottom of the barrel now......
31 posted on 02/01/2004 10:03:16 PM PST by Viking2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: KQQL
Bush served over 2 years active duty as a fighter pilot. Back int he day you earned points for time on active duty. His plane was being fazed out a year after he did the first two years and the Air Force isn't gonna spend a million dollare and 18 months training a pilot on another plane when he only has 12 months left.

He had more then enough active duty points to take him past his term of service !

33 posted on 02/01/2004 10:05:50 PM PST by america-rules (It's US or THEM so what part don't you understand ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: BenR2
Hello? Did you read my post? I think you and I are in total agreement here.

Yes I did read your post. Is there something I misrepresented? If so I apologize. And I am very happy to be in "total agreement" with you on this.

35 posted on 02/01/2004 10:07:07 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
"Cleland, who lost three limbs in Vietnam"

Cleland lost three limbs because of his own stupidity.
36 posted on 02/01/2004 10:07:48 PM PST by Lucy Lake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
And now we have Kerry ripping the great accomplishments of our military men and women in Iraq by saying the war was wrong.

Bad move on Lurch's part. He voted for it along with everyone else and he had access to same intelligence Bush had.

The idea that the double-talking two-faced John Kerry has a record to challenge Bush as commander in chief is just laughable. The opposite is true.

Bush has already proven himself as CIC. His mediocre military record as a kid doesn't matter now.
37 posted on 02/01/2004 10:09:42 PM PST by Welsh Rabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jackson Brown
IMO - Kerry is long over due for an attack on his real "war record", not just the medals. No better time than NOW!

Vietnam Veterans against Kerry is back up and running. They are looking for Vets from all 50 states to speak up!
Vietn Veterans Against John Kerry
Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry

38 posted on 02/01/2004 10:10:08 PM PST by armymarinemom (My Son Liberated the Honor Roll Students in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
This should work for the democraps as well as it worked for us in 96, when clinton had to shake Bob Dole's left hand after the debates.
39 posted on 02/01/2004 10:10:11 PM PST by birdsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armymarinemom
THANKS!!

I could not find the old site, thought they folded because of money or something similar.
40 posted on 02/01/2004 10:12:52 PM PST by Jackson Brown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson