To: Lord_Baltar
If I want to see some freak's boob or other bodypart I consider private, I will go to a red-light district. What was the date that you chose to redefine what was appropriate to show on television, or do the wonderfully moral people from Hollywood get to decide and you are just agreeing with them?
If someone exposes themself in front of my children I reserve the right to BUST THEIR FILTHY SKULL. I am sure the fact that it was on television (not in person) saved many fathers from assault charges.(those perves knew exactly what they were doing, just like when they grab their crotch for the camera).
If you want to see porn, knock yourself out, but you are not the one to choose when my children see nudity, and you don't get to decide for me what is nudity and what is harmless.
You, Hillary and the hippies all would agree that the porn show was just groovy.
I request that you do not engage in building another strawman argument and tearing it down.
860 posted on
02/01/2004 11:51:57 PM PST by
joe_broadway
(That's a microcosm of the way wars are started.)
To: joe_broadway
Ohhh, such violence Joe...
So let me get this straight, a women's breast pops out, and that gives you the right to Bust her Filthy Skull?
Seriously Joe, what other things give you the right to Bust someone's skull?
Do you let your children see you do it when you bust a skull?
To: joe_broadway
I'm no prude, but I was disgusted by the Janet Jackson/Timberlake fiasco. I was watching with my 21 year old son, and neither of us could believe it. For a young man who's in the midst of his "party years" to think it was bad..well, that says something.
I found this email address on another thread:
www.fccinfo@fcc.gov Voice your opinion there. I did, and I passed it on to all on my email list.
867 posted on
02/02/2004 12:13:40 AM PST by
LisaMalia
(Buckeye Fan since birth!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson