Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lord_Baltar
Okay. No sex acts on network TV, but toplessness is okay. Now, should your standard for allowing toplessness be forced on children and older folks whose morals are opposed to it? Or should we just keep it to HBO, Showtime, etc.?
800 posted on 02/01/2004 10:50:27 PM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 790 | View Replies ]


To: kristinn
Here kristinn, I'll keep this simple for ya.

Why don't we outlaw football, then those older folks and children who might be forced to see any more flashed breast during those pornographic half time shows can be saved...

See, Problem solved...

Seriously kristinn. Whether what happend was an accident of not is a matter of debate. Do I care, one way or the other. Not in the slightest.

Am I offended by a momentary sight of Janet's Boob? not even in the slightest.

Do I think Oprah Winfrey or Rickie Lake should be doing their shows topless? Not if they plan on keeping viewers.

Bottom line, this was a flash, whether accidental or not is irrelevant. It's not like Barbara Walters is threatening to do 20/20 every week with her breasts strapped to her waist band.

So I don't think we're gonna be seeing topless women on regular network TV for now...
806 posted on 02/01/2004 10:57:08 PM PST by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 800 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Kristin, obviously he thinks Janet Jackson should be applauded, while those who made money from or spent money on the SuperBowl should be chastised. By that reasoning, we should ignore Janet Jackson for exposing herself to children, and send me to jail for spending $27.00 on SuperBowl party groceries.
815 posted on 02/01/2004 11:01:50 PM PST by Reddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 800 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson