Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wesley Clark vows to curb illegal immigration if elected president (Fires salvo from right at Bush)
AP ^ | Jan 31, 2004 | BETH FOUHY

Posted on 01/31/2004 4:08:48 PM PST by nwrep

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:45:40 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Wesley Clark pledged Saturday to "get our balance right" by stemming illegal immigration while allowing immigrants to earn citizenship over time.

Appearing in this military community near the border with Mexico, the retired general said, "We are going to control our borders, going to work with the government of Mexico to stem what's going on down there because we have to."


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004; aliens; clark; illegalimmigration; immigrantlist; immigration; issues
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-262 next last
To: Lion in Winter
but something about killing a house full of innocent women & kids just to get one nutcase preacher, sorta bothers me.

I meant just putting tanks on the border.

21 posted on 01/31/2004 4:19:50 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Bush stole issues from the Dems, and they in turn steal issues from him. This will be interesting.
22 posted on 01/31/2004 4:20:10 PM PST by Djarum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Wesley Clark pledged Saturday to "get our balance right" by stemming illegal immigration while allowing immigrants to earn citizenship over time.

While holding a damp finger in the wind.

23 posted on 01/31/2004 4:20:11 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Clark's living in a fantasy world and playing to emotions. The only way to seriously change the immigration situation is to totally deny any government assistance to non-citizens, and penalize employers who break the law. The 'anchor baby' thing has to change too, but it would take a constitutional amendment if I'm not mistaken.

No way he's going to propose a reduction in government, just more federal money for border control, a potentially bottomless pit.

24 posted on 01/31/2004 4:21:51 PM PST by ovrtaxt (we are the pawns of partisanship, when we ought to be the soldiers of principle. - Alan Keyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Djarum
Bush stole issues from the Dems, and they in turn steal issues from him.

Moocho political savvy on Dubya's part IMHO.

25 posted on 01/31/2004 4:22:06 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: nwrep
This is exactly what scares me about Clark...he will say
ANYTHING to get votes. Total whore. Like when he told the
feminists..abortion is just fine 1 minute before delivery!

Then after receiving flack, he changed his position.

Clark is UNSTABLE, without core valuse, switches parties
and position more often than I change underwear.
27 posted on 01/31/2004 4:23:35 PM PST by gwbiny2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
A campaign promise by an elitist globalist wannabe...whose former commander says
has character issues...?
A Promise worth nothing...
28 posted on 01/31/2004 4:23:49 PM PST by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Yes, he's setting himself apart from the rest of the pack on an issue no one really wants to touch.

Now, you could also view it as a desperate and/or disingenous move, but I still think it's politically smart.

29 posted on 01/31/2004 4:24:20 PM PST by B Knotts (Recall Arnold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
A month ago, after Bush announced his plan, wasn't Clark Bar-Sinister one of those saying that Bush's plan didn't go far enough?
30 posted on 01/31/2004 4:24:40 PM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetValue
Advice to Clark: Change your ways.

Do you want him to win the Presidency??

31 posted on 01/31/2004 4:24:41 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Ditto regarding the anti-Bush bandwagon. Not letting the facts get in the way of their opinions.
32 posted on 01/31/2004 4:25:40 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lion in Winter
I don't care for Clark, either, but I was just pointing out that he is making a smart move in this particular case, as it will get him some media traction, in all likelihood, simply because the rest of the Democrats won't even go near the issue.
33 posted on 01/31/2004 4:26:04 PM PST by B Knotts (Recall Arnold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
I agree, and I fully expect Savage to endore him tomorrow.

If so, it will make for some interesting lurking on DU...
34 posted on 01/31/2004 4:26:10 PM PST by Welsh Rabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Here's a tin-foil-hat special. Maybe Kerry and Clark have a deal. Clark runs as Ross Perot and torpedoes Bush in the South by running to his right, Kerry finds ways to hook Clark up with money or fame.
35 posted on 01/31/2004 4:26:24 PM PST by .cnI redruM (Vae victis! - [woe to the vanquished].)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
This would have been smarter if he had done it after the proposal. Now Arizonans will see it as opportunism and Democrat primary voters won't be terribly attracted to it anyway.

You know, I've given thought to the following: If we accept the premises that (1) the Clintons do not want Kerry to win the presidency and (2) Clark is the Clintons' sock puppet, then it stands to reason that Clark may make a third party run.

36 posted on 01/31/2004 4:26:46 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Isn't there one reporter out there who would ask these clowns HOW they would do the things they say?

What's the point of having these candidates tell the crowd and the press anything at all without some questioning involved.

Just once - I'd like to see them tell us - not WHAT they will do - but also HOW they intend to do it.

37 posted on 01/31/2004 4:27:40 PM PST by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
Moocho political savvy on Dubya's part IMHO.

Bush is savvy, while Clark is merely "holding a damp finger in the wind." Why is that?

38 posted on 01/31/2004 4:27:58 PM PST by Djarum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: seamole
Good find, seamole.

The naivety of people to believe Clark might actually stem illegal immigration is astounding.
39 posted on 01/31/2004 4:27:59 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
You could see this one coming a mile away.
40 posted on 01/31/2004 4:28:36 PM PST by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-262 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson