Skip to comments.
WHY INTELLIGENCE FAILED
New York Post ^
| 1/30/04
| RALPH PETERS
Posted on 01/30/2004 12:25:53 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:19:21 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
January 30, 2004 -- FEW human beings argue with con clusions they want to believe. When the U.S. intelligence community in sisted that Saddam's regime possessed hidden weapons of mass destruction, President Bush and his advisers welcomed the "evidence."
Bush believed correctly that Saddam needed to go. And the supportive analysis provided by U.S. intelligence was seconded by the British. Even the French and German intel organizations believed Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: intelligence; ralphpeters; wmd
1
posted on
01/30/2004 12:25:54 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
I wouldn't be so quick to close the book on WMD just yet. There could be a lot of egged faces with this rush to judgment.
To: Texasforever
I agree.
It ain't over 'till it's over.
3
posted on
01/30/2004 12:29:58 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
They are going to find huge stockpiles of WMD buried out in the desert somewhere.
All we have to do is find the people that buried them.
4
posted on
01/30/2004 12:35:07 AM PST
by
clee1
(Where's the beef???)
To: kattracks
Peters is usually a lot better as a novelist than as a columnist. His thinking is usually about as deep as a bird bath. But he does have a handful of good points in this one:
- we rely too much on technological systems
- our human capabilities are deficient because they have been neglected (the leaders in the intel community are as much to blame as Congress on this, though. The last DCI who was comfortable conducting operations was Casey, and even he couldn't undo the damage all the dud admirals did).
- Even if someone in the community wakes up and tells Congress what to do (unlikely), and Congress votes against self-interest and pushes talent (even less likely), it will take a decade or more to get traction.
Hopefully he will get some attention... the first step in fixing something is to recognise that it's busted.
However, a very important point is missing here. And that's this: no matter what we do with the intel community, the possibility of another surprize attack will exist as long as we have enemies with human will and human imagination.
Wesley Clark's claim that he could prevent another 9/11 is... well, it shows he's barking mad. The only way to prevent such attacks is to study the people who wish to do them, identify those people, and then hunt them down in their foreign lairs, and exterminate them like rats.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
To: kattracks
"We spend well over $30 billion a year on intelligence, primarily to buy and maintain technological systems."
A billion dollars in shoe leather would have helped immensely.
6
posted on
01/30/2004 1:03:44 AM PST
by
DeepDish
(This space for rent.)
To: Texasforever
Agree. I remember reading reports before the campaign (not the war - the war is the Global War on Terror)in Iraq began. They said that Iraqi WMDs were being sent to Syria.
This fits with Saddam's ways - in 1991 he sent his air force to Iran, as I recall.
Semper Fi,
To: kattracks
WHY INTELLIGENCE FAILEDThe Torracelli Principle.
8
posted on
01/30/2004 5:28:06 AM PST
by
Consort
To: Texasforever
Agree the book is still open on this. But his underlying analysis is still valid. We need to hit human intelligence harder. As for the "group think", boy that's a tough one to overcome.
9
posted on
01/30/2004 9:25:48 AM PST
by
Valin
(Politicians are like diapers. They both need changing regularly and for the same reason.)
To: Criminal Number 18F
# our human capabilities are deficient because they have been neglected (the leaders in the intel community are as much to blame as Congress on this, though. The last DCI who was comfortable conducting operations was Casey, and even he couldn't undo the damage all the dud admirals did). This wasn't just a bureaucratic failing. Clinton stood by as Hussein rounded them up en mass and slaughtered the organizations that the U.S. HAD built in Iraq - despite Hussein having to violate his cease-fire to do so. ...And the Clinton Administration canned the guys who saw it coming and tried to prosecute them.
10
posted on
01/30/2004 9:44:30 AM PST
by
lepton
To: Heuristic Hiker
Excellent RP ping for you.
To: clee1
They are going to find huge stockpiles of WMD buried out in the desert somewhere. All we have to do is find the people that buried them. They may found at the same spot. It should be easy though. The bodies are pushing up cactus, the chemicals turn the cactus neon green .
12
posted on
01/31/2004 12:12:33 AM PST
by
Go Gordon
(A Dean Presidency would be as effective as a one-legged man in a butt kicking contest)
To: Go Gordon
Iraq is a large country, much of it uninhabited and desolate.
We will eventually catch some of the people that ordered the hiding of the WMD's - they will be made to cough up the info.
13
posted on
01/31/2004 12:33:33 AM PST
by
clee1
(Where's the beef???)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson