To: areafiftyone
No surprise here (for me). Others, however, seem to be leaning towards the "no-WMD camp". We'll find them. Patience, please.
5 posted on
01/29/2004 6:44:57 AM PST by
sarasota
To: sarasota
No surprise here (for me). Others, however, seem to be leaning towards the "no-WMD camp". We'll find them. Patience, please. And what a trump card that would be with an election bearing down on us. Are you saying we should keep our powder dry?
7 posted on
01/29/2004 6:48:15 AM PST by
rhombus
To: sarasota
I am in the no WMD camp. Face it. A janitor in a WMD facility could become a very wealthy man right now by telling us where the stuff was buried. Some scientist who drank too much, could have told his wife where they are. To have a very active program, there are way too many people who know things. One person would have blabbed right now, either out of greed, out of spite, or out of fear of a very mean looking CIA field agent.
It would have happened by now unless only a few dozen people knew where stuff was buried, and then they were almost all murdered.
Occam's razor. Most logical explanation is that they aren't there. Saddam might have believed his scientists were spending money on WMDs while they were using it on booze and hookers, but the only logical explanation now, especially after his capture, and the promise of untold riches if you are the one guy who can lead the US to the goodies, means that they just ain't there.
Jamir the Mop Jockey, who was sweeping up the manufacturing plant as they discussed the burial spot for WMD's while ignoring him, would be making plans of having an estate in the bahamas already if he actually had such info to give.
9 posted on
01/29/2004 6:49:49 AM PST by
dogbyte12
To: sarasota
Sure you will. Sure you will. Just keep telling yourself that
11 posted on
01/29/2004 6:50:20 AM PST by
billbears
(Deo Vindice.)
To: sarasota
Well, maybe they'll turn up. But then one of history's biggest mysteries will be why didn't Saddam use them. It could inspire historians and writers for decades.
If he had even tried to use them, we should know by now, there'd be some evidence of it : an aborted air mission, the firing of SCUDs at Coalition forces or at Israel in some desperate attempt to bring the other Arab nations in the war, etc. But there's just zilch. Did he have the weapons, and his commanders stole them to buy their safe passage to Syria ? That would explain why Saddam was stuck in Iraq, hiding literally under a rock. Did they refuse to use them so as to avoid a postwar firing squad, and just hid them really well ?
I have some difficulty accepting he spirited the weapons out of his country and yet chose to stay there, hidden in his little spider hole with absolutely NO chance of ever coming back to power. He could have said to the Syrians : hide me, and half the weapons are yours. Strange.
To: sarasota
I agree.
Everyone,including Saddam Hussein knew he had these items.
If he destroyed them,why didn't he tell anyone?
They are there.
30 posted on
01/29/2004 6:58:36 AM PST by
Redcoat LI
("If you're going to shoot,shoot,don't talk" Tuco BenedictoPacifico Juan Maria Ramirez)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson