I fully agree that I'm utterly opposed to the treasonous neo-cons and all they stand for. I'm opposed four-square to Bush II's lies about WMD and Iraqi connections to terrorism, and I'm eight-square against his treasonous refusal to enforce our immigration laws and allowing a silent invasion of our sovereign territory even after we were attacked by illegal immigrants. I'm sixteen-square against his waffling on social issues and his lukewarm, purely palliative efforts to appoint strict constructionists to the bench.
As we say in Wisconsin, ya sure ya betcha I'm opposed to Bush II, and frankly I'd prefer to see Bush II's doggie (what's its name) elected to the office than him.
No doubt. I'm in the opposition.
It's always the case in war that the enemy is most dangerous when he's out of uniform and behind your own lines. The Democrats are the uniformed regulars of the Army of Treason, but the neo-cons are their fifth column. The first order of business is to terminate the neo-con subversion, and then we'll be able to fight the regulars without having to watch our own backs.
They're the same, Mr. Texas. DemonRats = Pubbies.
But of the two, the Pubbies are the more dangerous, because we think they're our own.
I thought you had abandoned the "pubbies" so how can they be OUR own? You have a very hard time keeping your arguments on track.
If you knew then what you know now you would have not voted for Reagan
The GOP is more dangerous than the Democrats
The "neocons" are the nations most imminent threat.
I would suggest that your entire outlook is in complete agreement with the most fringe of the left fringe and that you should join them in their efforts to rid the country of all GOP office holders. BTW, put some chewing tobacco on that rash.