What is going on? Republicans have been working for at least 10 years to Kill this Department and De-Fund it. Now why is Bush set to increase it to it's highest levels in 20 years? It is this kind of idiocy from Bush that makes me wonder what he, and of course Rove, are thinking. Spending is up under Bush, all these new programs he is proposing, like the Prescription Drug bill, are exploding federal spending all out of control. My God if I want Nanny State care and massive spending I can vote for Democrats. Where in the Hell is the Republican Leadeship on this? There ain't going to be any Hollywood votes for this and this really is pandering to the lowest degree along with the Immigration idea!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: Captain Peter Blood
It's called "triangulation". Worked like a charm for Clinton.
I'd hoped for better from President Bush.
2 posted on
01/28/2004 6:20:13 PM PST by
MamaLucci
To: Captain Peter Blood
Disgusting, if true.
3 posted on
01/28/2004 6:20:24 PM PST by
Enterprise
("You sit down. You had your say. Now I'm going to have my say.")
To: Captain Peter Blood
Bump.
4 posted on
01/28/2004 6:21:13 PM PST by
Bernard Marx
(In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Well, let's wait to see what exactly is in it.
After all the "biggest increase in twenty years" might amount to a few million dollars.
It might also be used to fund patriotic art or propaganda efforts overseas.
It won't be put exactly that way, of course- but something like that.
In any case, within the scheme of the Federal Budget, whatever is proposed will be pocket change.
To: Captain Peter Blood
If this story is accurate, it's a strategic error on the part of the White House.
6 posted on
01/28/2004 6:21:19 PM PST by
Dog Gone
To: Captain Peter Blood
Why is he torturing us like this? Why? It makes no sense. If I go with me thesis that you can't say Bush is a man of conscience about the war, but does other things purely out of political motivation. So is this really his conscience? If so, I truly need to rethink him. I know, what's the alternative...but it's getting harder and harder to make my mouth say those words.
7 posted on
01/28/2004 6:21:24 PM PST by
Hildy
To: Captain Peter Blood; Travis McGee
No.. conservatives want to kill the endowment.... Republicans want to be re-elected more than anything else.
Its party over principle
8 posted on
01/28/2004 6:21:37 PM PST by
GeronL
(Two kinds of people in this country: Makers and Takers........ which are you?)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Mr President, we have this little thing called the deficit.
I'm not trying to be some anti-Bush guy like some people around here are, but this is the type of worthless spending that is just not needed.
What happened to 1% growth in non-defense non-homeland security spending?
9 posted on
01/28/2004 6:21:40 PM PST by
RWR8189
(Its Morning in America Again!)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Of course, earlier in the week there was a rumor he wanted to LIMIT spending.... I knew it wasn't true
12 posted on
01/28/2004 6:22:24 PM PST by
GeronL
(Two kinds of people in this country: Makers and Takers........ which are you?)
To: Captain Peter Blood; Carry_Okie; forester; sasquatch; B4Ranch; SierraWasp; hedgetrimmer; ...
Who are the Democrats in the race again?
13 posted on
01/28/2004 6:22:34 PM PST by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Call me naive, ignorant, or both, but what the hell is the national endowment for the arts?
To: Captain Peter Blood
Is bush a closet socialist?
21 posted on
01/28/2004 6:27:20 PM PST by
tubavil
To: Captain Peter Blood
Sick.....just sick!!
24 posted on
01/28/2004 6:27:39 PM PST by
pollywog
(Psalm 121;1 I Lift mine eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Talk about welfare for the rich! N.E.A. Is nothing but funding to allow the rich to indulge their hobbies at the expense of the taxpayers. At least that is what the left will call it now that a republican wants to fund it.
25 posted on
01/28/2004 6:27:42 PM PST by
Boiling point
(Too well informed to be a democrat)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Yup the pubbies are sure conservative aren't they big education increases, cfr, now this.
Oh well where are the conservatives going to go, conservatives have become the demo rat blacks of the pubbie party.
27 posted on
01/28/2004 6:27:59 PM PST by
dts32041
("Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed" RAH)
To: Captain Peter Blood
I think he is trying to soften them, but he needs to understand that it's appeasement.
I actually think the libs will say this is irresponsible in a time of deficits. In some ways, I see the intelligence of this, but I think he could have put the money towards Pell grants.
29 posted on
01/28/2004 6:28:03 PM PST by
faithincowboys
( Zell Miller is the only DC Democrat not committing treason.)
To: Captain Peter Blood
They need more money for the illegal alien undocumented worker artists to create more perverted art. Just doing the preverted things normal Americans don't want.
31 posted on
01/28/2004 6:28:32 PM PST by
Beck_isright
("Those who stand for nothing fall for anything."-Alexander Hamilton)
To: Captain Peter Blood
Just be a good little Bushbot and keep repeating:
"Bush can do no wrong,...."
"Bush can do no wrong,..."
36 posted on
01/28/2004 6:29:04 PM PST by
Merdoug
To: Captain Peter Blood
Because Bush is not a Conservative. He is a republican.
To: Captain Peter Blood
Just when I come around to the idea of voting for Bush again, he goes and does something I despise...
If this is true, then I give up on America.
42 posted on
01/28/2004 6:30:42 PM PST by
freedomcrusader
(Proudly wearing the politically incorrect label "crusader" since 1/29/2001)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson