Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUDGET INCREASE FOR THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENT OF THE ARTS
The Drudge Report ^ | 01-28-2004 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 01/28/2004 6:18:24 PM PST by Captain Peter Blood

BUSH TO SEEK BIG BUDGET INCREASE FOR NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS... Laura Bush plans to announce the request -- for the largest increase in two decades -- on Thursday... Developing...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arts; artsfunding; budgetbuster; bush; federalspending; laurabush; nea; taxdollarsatwork; youpayforthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 1,201-1,203 next last
To: victoryovertheleft
Again, we're talking about a few million dollars here. Nothing, in government terms

Look at it this way: It's the entire tax bill of several thousand of your neighbors.

Now, go tell them it's "nothing". In government terms, of course.

I've so had it with this kind of rationalization crap. Go bow down to your Big Stupid Republican Government. I plan to kick it in the nuts.

621 posted on 01/28/2004 8:50:56 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Dick Gephardt. Before he dicks you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

Comment #622 Removed by Moderator

To: William Creel
Four years is too long. Don't you see that?
623 posted on 01/28/2004 8:52:10 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (BUSH/CHENEY 2004...the alternative is too frightening to contemplate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Again, the problem is neither party has any loyalty to the U.S. Constitution! Yet, every president, every member of Congress, and every court justice takes an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. Unfortunately, the vast majority of these people prove on a daily basis that they have no intention of honoring their oath of office.

Until the American people begin holding their elected officials accountable to the U.S. Constitution, it will not matter one iota which party is in the White House and which party controls Congress! In fact, until the American people awaken to this reality, the best we can hope for is a divided federal government. By that I mean, when one party controls the White House, be sure the other party controls Congress and vice versa. Liberty and freedom will not long survive one party, Republican or Democrat, in control of the entire federal government!

Of course, the real solution resides with the American people becoming a constitutionally informed, educated, and committed electorate. Is anyone holding their breath?
624 posted on 01/28/2004 8:53:05 PM PST by jgrubbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Sorry guys. The info I was relying on was for the 2004 budget. It looks like Charles H. Taylor of North Carolina has been very influential in both these spending increases. Anyone know what his story is?
625 posted on 01/28/2004 8:53:05 PM PST by hobson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]

Comment #626 Removed by Moderator

To: gatorbait
Yep, huge margins , too.

My point is that the hated, "radical right wingers" kept getting sent back to DC, while RINOs like Dole had their tails handed to them.

The biggest growth was when? 2002 wasn't it?

Only in your Orwellian statist cult.

I think they got 7 Senate seats in 1994 and 50 House seats also.

2002 was 5 Senate seats, and a half dozen House seats, IIRC.

Look,, go vote CP and be a marginal voter

Truth be told, all of us are "marginal voters". You or I have a better chance of winning the lottery than having a single vote make a difference.

I do find it sort of interesting how often the GOP apologists say they "don't need our vote". In truth, one vote won't matter, but it is awfully damn arrogant considering they only won Florida by 500 votes. A few other states were almost that close.

Terry McAuliffe will french kiss you for your principled stands just as the DNC's media readers are enjoying your principled stands.

Not as much as they are enjoying Bush's spending spree.

627 posted on 01/28/2004 8:54:26 PM PST by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 605 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
"Dear God, you people may as well be liberals."

They are.

628 posted on 01/28/2004 8:54:45 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies]

To: victoryovertheleft
A-men. Newt had everybody following his orders.

Newt passed the torch to W, W extinguished the flame so he could be liked by ivy leaguers. I'm disgusted.
629 posted on 01/28/2004 8:54:46 PM PST by Finalapproach29er ("Don't shoot Mongo, you'll only make him mad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood
Gee, it is just a 15 to 20 Million dollar increase and we get all the commotions here. The price tag is less than the 50 Million dollar price tag for the Rainforest in Iowa project, or compare this to the other porkies like to the 5 million dollar funding for a "green energy" Hooters restaurant in Louisiana or the million dollar project to clean up a swimming pool in Nevada, or how about a government financed celebration of Alaska statehood (cost 300,000 dollars), or the million dollar project to study the DNA of Bears in Montana? I'd rather get some good PR for a 15 to 20 million price tag than to fund all those absolute ridiculous things like Rainforest in Iowa crap.
630 posted on 01/28/2004 8:54:51 PM PST by FRgal4u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Seeing how Bush's plan was and still is DOA, I'm not to worried about that. Most rational people knew it was never going to pass Congress especially the House.
631 posted on 01/28/2004 8:55:26 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 590 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Only difference is the amount of the deficit, which is less in the case of the Democrats because they would overspend without a face-saving meager tax rate reduction. We are doomed.

But the Rats would cut defense spending, so don't lose hope.

[sarcasm]

632 posted on 01/28/2004 8:55:38 PM PST by luvbach1 (In the know on the border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
Where do you think the electorate stands on the funding for this stuff?

Instead of pontificating about it, let's examine some actual election results. The last time any party won in a landslide was the Republicans in 1994. And they supported abolishing not only the NEA, but also 4 cabinet departments. They got about 55% of the vote.

The Contract with America was all but given a pass by the media in 1994. Because of that many in the mushy middle joined conservatives in voting for it.

Well then, the R Congress gets elected in '94 and along comes the media in '95 with its constant barrage against Newt and the Contract and by the end of '95 the mushy middle ended it's support of decreased government spending as they believed the propaganda that children and god-knows-what would be tossed in the streets by the mean R's. The mushy middle was scared off by the media in '95 and the election of '94 was just the absence of this -- all to the benefit of the Clintons.

In 2000 -- the last presidential vote -- Al Gore and Ralph Nader received a majority of the vote. It is my guess that these voters can't get enough of government spending.

I blame them!

633 posted on 01/28/2004 8:55:39 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 576 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
War on Terror? Hell, we're letting the terrorists all in through Mexico anyway. Don't tell me this guy is the only one.
634 posted on 01/28/2004 8:55:42 PM PST by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
In his Farewell Address, our first and greatest President, George Washington, loquaciously lobbied the American people to guard against over-infatuation with political parties. Anyone reading his warnings today will be impressed with his insight and sagacity. Virtually everything he predicted has come to pass. Blind loyalty to political parties has corrupted our public institutions, blinded the hearts and minds of the American people, and opened wide the door to undue foreign influence.
635 posted on 01/28/2004 8:55:51 PM PST by jgrubbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
Look at it this way: It's the entire tax bill of several thousand of your neighbors.

If those neighbors decided to not pay their taxes in protest of this, do you expect George the Bush to offer them amnesty?

636 posted on 01/28/2004 8:56:07 PM PST by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
You know, it is amazing how people here blow a gasket before anything has even been officially announced.

After being punched several times already by this administration, one has a tendency to flinch, and strike back quickly.

637 posted on 01/28/2004 8:56:14 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

Comment #638 Removed by Moderator

To: jgrubbs
He acted like he could care less what I thought, he knew that even if me and other conservatives didn't agree with him that he could just replace our votes with all the new recipients of the pork.

Alern Specter was like that .. now he's fighting for his seat in the Senate

I'll admit, should he win the primary, I will hold my nose and vote for him because of the bigger picture and we need to keep control of the senate .. but he DOES NOT have my vote in the primary

639 posted on 01/28/2004 8:56:44 PM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
The Constitution Party is not going to be in double-digits, but let's dream anyway - a double-digit turnout for the Constitution Party equals a Democrat in the Oval Office. And I'll tell you what: In the current environment, one day - if it is a significant one - is too long to have a Democrat sitting behind that desk.
640 posted on 01/28/2004 8:57:03 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (BUSH/CHENEY 2004...the alternative is too frightening to contemplate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 1,201-1,203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson