Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Post Toasties
Also, why couldn't the number of files storable on a given memory be a SW configurable parameter upon reset?

It's not that easy if they are using the FAT filesystem. It's a hard limit.

The FAT filesystem stores the root directory differently than subdirectories. It has a fixed size and goes in a specific location on the media. Even MS couldn't expand it without breaking existing software (but the FAT32 and NTFS filesystems do not have this limit).

Now, if they are indeed using the FAT filesystem and ran into the root directory limit, they could easily solve it by storing the files in subdirectories under the root - the number of files allowed in subdirectories is limited only by the amount of space available.

41 posted on 01/28/2004 10:05:40 AM PST by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Mannaggia l'America
Fat32 has a limit for a single folder but it's pretty absurd (I think is 2048, might be 10,000ish), only time I ever run into is dumping things through the print spooler because those files are tiny and you can fill the spool directory before filling the harddrive. NTFS is wide open though.
52 posted on 01/28/2004 10:43:38 AM PST by discostu (are you in the pocket of the moment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson