Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mars rocks may be 'sedimentary'
BBC News ^ | Tuesday, 27 January, 2004, 17:33 GMT

Posted on 01/27/2004 10:39:22 AM PST by mjp

Nasa scientists have discovered what might be the most compelling evidence yet of rocks formed in water on Mars.

The Opportunity rover has sent back pictures of rock slabs that appear to contain thin layers, say researchers.

On Earth, this feature is suggestive of sedimentary rocks that are the product of material deposited by water or wind.

The layers are as thin as a centimetre in places which indicates they are unlikely to be old lava flows, but Nasa cautioned further analysis was needed.

Mission scientist Dr Andrew Knoll said that if the rocks were in fact sedimentary and not volcanic, they were probably formed by water and not by wind-borne sediments.

'Water-borne'

But the rover will need to drive up to the rocks to examine them closely with its science instruments to rule out a volcanic origin.

"It's going to be fascinating beyond words to get up close and personal with this thing," said payload lead scientist Steve Squyres.

When the rover gets close to the rocks it will be able to examine their microscopic structure.

Rock layers deposited by ash are usually laid down in parallel layers.

But if the rocks are sedimentary, there should be little imperfections and breaks between the layers. The rock particles should also be rounded.

Sedimentary rocks are often altered chemically by the water, but there are instances where this is not the case, scientists said.

The rover's alpha particle X-ray spectrometer should be able to examine the elemental chemistry of these rocks.

Dr Knoll suggested the rocks could be very old, possibly in the order of billions of years.

Power loss

Meanwhile, scientists said that Opportunity was losing some of its power.

Mission manager Jim Erickson said the likely cause was a thermostatically-controlled heater in the shoulder joint of the rover's arm, which is turning on automatically in response to drops in temperature.

"Normally, this is enabled by the ground and a thermostat on the side of the rover determines what the air temperature is, and if it is cold enough, it turns on the heater in this arm to keep it up to a temperature for operation," said Mr Erickson.

"Now, we don't normally always want it on because we aren't normally always operating the arm. Right now we're believing that it's going to be continuously on whenever it's cold enough."


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

1 posted on 01/27/2004 10:39:23 AM PST by mjp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mjp
Slate?
2 posted on 01/27/2004 10:41:01 AM PST by demlosers (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">Miserable Failure</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Gonna take a sedimental journey.
3 posted on 01/27/2004 10:42:09 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mjp
What's the over under on how long before this rover breaks down?
4 posted on 01/27/2004 10:42:35 AM PST by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjp
If they find fossil seashells embedded in the sedimentary rock, what would Andy Rooney have to say about NASA's subsequent 10x budget increase?
5 posted on 01/27/2004 10:42:56 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjp
But they are definitely "rocks."
6 posted on 01/27/2004 10:43:05 AM PST by TheBigB (I am Elmer J. Fudd, millionaire. I own a mansion and a yacht.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjp
"Sedimentary, my Dear Watson!"

Sherlock Holmes
7 posted on 01/27/2004 10:43:26 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (This tagline was produced by outsourced labor in India.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mjp
Free giant shrimp, here I come! :-P
8 posted on 01/27/2004 10:44:17 AM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Gonna take a sedimental journey.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!

9 posted on 01/27/2004 10:46:41 AM PST by jigsaw (Freeper Fidelis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: aruanan
Thats Gneiss as Schist...
11 posted on 01/27/2004 11:02:31 AM PST by Axenolith (Oh, look! It's the government, pretending that they care about people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mjp
Interesting. However, it seems strange that the scientists do not also mention that some sort of an extreme force, e.g., long-term deep burial, is required to consolidate loose sediment into "rocks". Perhaps once the question as to the structure of the sedimentary rocks has been answered, another interesting question is what geologic forces brought these rocks to the surface of Mars; wind, water and/or ice erosion, crustal movements, volcanics, etc.?

Muleteam1

12 posted on 01/27/2004 11:03:56 AM PST by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Isn't Slate a metamorphic rock (heat altered shale ?)
13 posted on 01/27/2004 11:04:02 AM PST by XRdsRev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mjp
Build a Stargate!
14 posted on 01/27/2004 11:04:05 AM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Gonna take a sedimental journey.

They're definitely sedentary rocks.

15 posted on 01/27/2004 11:04:11 AM PST by In_25_words_or_less
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

"Thet're rocks!" said a mentary.
16 posted on 01/27/2004 11:06:21 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith
This one's Gneiss...this one's Granite

The first one's nice but don't take it for granted.
17 posted on 01/27/2004 11:06:21 AM PST by XRdsRev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: XRdsRev
Isn't Slate a metamorphic rock (heat altered shale ?)

OK

18 posted on 01/27/2004 11:09:28 AM PST by demlosers (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">Miserable Failure</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Slate?

Slate with fossils???

19 posted on 01/27/2004 11:12:17 AM PST by null and void (It's the JOBS, Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
If they find fossil seashells embedded in the sedimentary rock, what would Andy Rooney have to say about NASA's subsequent 10x budget increase?

Agreed about this possibility. I was a geology major for a few years, and still sort of fancy myself as a casual authority on rocks. If a scene like this was in the Mojave desert I would expect to fine marine fossils in an outcrop like this. I would head straight over with my hammer and try to separate these slabs along their seems.

Imagine the hullabaloo if they send back a close-up later this month and there are little beasties fossilized in this rock!

20 posted on 01/27/2004 11:13:56 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (Fighting for Freedom and Having Fun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson